Teams

SS-H ORANGE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs SS-LT GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Price / Cindy Louder vs Jennifer Mell / Karen Fukuoka6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMais Ashkar / Amy Gilson vs Joslin Alexander / Carmel Hamilton6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-12vs CCV NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Price / Xuejing Cai vs Nicky Fleming / Melissa Mitarotonda6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRebecca Powell vs Rebecca Aronoff3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Louder / Amy Gilson vs Tina Suneja / Priscilla Hawkinson6-2, 7-5
2026-08-05vs HW PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Louder / Amy Gilson vs Kelsey Mueller / Whitney Albro2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Powell / Suzette Calvillo vs Katrina Sevier / Stephanie Mussell7-5, 7-5
2026-07-29vs EM BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzette Calvillo / Cindy Louder vs Anne Kay / Lisa LoJacono5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMais Ashkar vs Maricela Barbosa Galvez2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Powell / Joanne Holden vs Jane Morrissey / Judith Andrews3-6, 6-7
2026-07-25vs HG YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesSuzette Calvillo / Joanne Holden vs Amanda Case / Melissa Shanahan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Powell / Amy Gilson vs Beth Seuell / Pilar Allen6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Joanne Holden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Amy Gilson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.33
Xuejing Cai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Suzette Calvillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Mais Ashkar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Rebecca Powell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.04
Cindy Louder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Powell + Suzette Calvillo8357% games+2.3% vs expected
Suzette Calvillo + Joanne Holden5255% games−3.4% vs expected
Cindy Louder + Xuejing Cai123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Powell + Xuejing Cai123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanne Holden
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Amy Gilson
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Xuejing Cai
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Suzette Calvillo
37W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Mais Ashkar
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Rebecca Powell
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Cindy Louder
43W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.