Teams

PC-Baby's Got Backhand

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-04-18vs YTC-We Love Tennis!Won 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Galioto / Robin Jorgensen vs Rose Longoria / Judi Harris6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBrooke Jones vs Brooke Wentz1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKD Organ / Kari Denson vs Martha Marchand / Diane Hehir6-3, 6-4
2021-04-17vs YTC-We Love Tennis!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Galioto / Robin Jorgensen vs Brooke Wentz / Michelle Russell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrooke Jones vs Judi Harris2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Weber / Danielle Dunigan vs Erika Mullins / Dana Lybeck6-3, 6-3
2021-04-17vs PC-Ts DevilsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Galioto / Brooke Jones vs Sarah Brooks / Shannon Khounnala3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKD Organ vs Heather Donais0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Jorgensen / Danielle Dunigan vs Rhiannon Brooks / Shannon Robison0-6, 1-6
2021-04-16vs PC-Ts DevilsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Jorgensen / Brooke Jones vs Cheyenne Morrison / Heather Donais7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKD Organ vs Jennifer Huebner - (DQ)0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Dunigan / Kari Denson vs Shannon Robison / Rhiannon Brooks1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC-Ts Devils40120144
2PC-Baby's Got Backhand133918119
3YTC-We Love Tennis!133919129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Robin Jorgensen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Danielle Dunigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brooke Jones
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Kathleen Galioto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
KD Organ
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Heather Weber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kari Denson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Galioto + Robin Jorgensen5365% games+15.7% vs expected
Brooke Jones + Robin Jorgensen5258% games+11.4% vs expected
Kathleen Galioto + Kari Denson2443% games+5.5% vs expected
Heather Weber + Danielle Dunigan6452% games+5.4% vs expected
Kathleen Galioto + KD Organ4845% games+1.1% vs expected
Heather Weber + Kari Denson1637% games−6.2% vs expected
KD Organ + Kari Denson3251% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Dunigan + Kari Denson2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robin Jorgensen
68W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Danielle Dunigan
59W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Brooke Jones
32W–30L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Galioto
23W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
KD Organ
18W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Heather Weber
22W–49L career · 1 line in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kari Denson
17W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.