Teams

Team Curtis

2023 Calvert Adult 55 & Over · Calvert Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-20vs Team DonovanWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Jill Huntington vs Carol Donovan / Dawn Ackermann6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / REGINA DAVIS vs Casey MCFANN / Lori Romanek3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-06vs Team DonovanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Adriani / Brandie Sparr vs Jennifer Arthur / Casey MCFANN2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Jill Huntington vs Dawn Ackermann / Lori Romanek6-4, 6-2
2023-07-05vs Team DonovanWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Adriani / Brandie Sparr vs Carol Donovan / Cindi Hodskins6-3, 7-5
2023-06-30vs Team DonovanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Caryn Lynch vs Casey MCFANN / Dawn Ackermann6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Louden / Jill Huntington vs Carol Donovan / Lynn Hoffman7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs Team DonovanWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Adriani / Brandie Sparr vs Trish Fulcher / Cindi Hodskins1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Huntington / Sabra Szczyglowski vs Jennifer Arthur / Lynn Hoffman6-4, 6-2
2023-06-06vs Team DonovanWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Adriani / Brandie Sparr vs Lori Romanek / Trish Fulcher6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / REGINA DAVIS vs Becky Lebow / Lynn Hoffman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs Team DonovanWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / REGINA DAVIS vs Carol Donovan / Becky Lebow6-2, 6-4
2023-05-23vs Team DonovanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesREGINA DAVIS / Rosalie Hooper vs Cindi Hodskins / Lori Romanek5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSandra Curtis / Brandie Sparr vs Dawn Ackermann / Carol Donovan6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Brandie Sparr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Cynthia Clinton Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Jill Huntington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
REGINA DAVIS
published
2.99
Patricia Louden
published
2.96
Trish Houck
published
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
2.73
Karen Adriani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

REGINA DAVIS + Cynthia Clinton Brown2346% gamesnot enough data
Rosalie Hooper + Trish Houck033 matchesnot enough data
Brandie Sparr + Jill Huntington303 matchesnot enough data
Sabra Szczyglowski + Patricia Louden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Cynthia Clinton Brown
118W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Jill Huntington
206W–137L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.14
REGINA DAVIS
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Patricia Louden
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Trish Houck
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
Karen Adriani
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.