Teams

RMaher/Maumelle/BP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-12vs Law/LR/PVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesKaitlen Stewart vs Lauren Green6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLydia Hunjan vs Shelby Fisher0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAnne McPherson vs Cheryl Norris6-4, 6-1
2024-11-25vs Law/LR/PVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnne McPherson vs Shelby Fisher3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKaitlen Stewart vs Christine Castillo6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesGracie Bailey vs Sarah Declerk6-2, 6-3
2024-11-11vs Shillcutt/Jacksonville/BPLost 12
L#1 SinglesKaitlen Stewart vs Lacey Watts1-6, 4-3
L#2 SinglesCaroline Dominick vs Lauren Shillcutt1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesGracie Bailey vs Bethany Downs6-0, 6-2
2024-11-06vs Chandler/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesRebecca Roden vs Molly Morrison6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Taylor Ransdell6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKarla Karwoski vs Anna Simpson3-6, 5-7
2024-10-28vs Compton/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesCaroline Dominick vs Amanda Mamula7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGracie Bailey vs Sarah Fike6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKarla Karwoski vs Mona Mahmoud6-1, 6-0
2024-10-21vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 SinglesRebecca Roden vs Katie Rutledge6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRegina Maher vs Roz Taylor6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKarla Karwoski vs Brooke Fixler6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Regina Maher
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.10
Gracie Bailey
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.01
Kaitlen Stewart
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.92
Rebecca Roden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Anne McPherson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Lydia Hunjan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Caroline Dominick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.73
Karla Karwoski
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regina Maher
51W–25L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Gracie Bailey
20W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.10
Kaitlen Stewart
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
Rebecca Roden
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Anne McPherson
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Lydia Hunjan
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Caroline Dominick
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Karla Karwoski
19W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%5%95%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.