← Teams

MPRC-Jean/Fisher

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Carrie Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Kirsten Giacomini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Kristen Benkstein
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Aracelia Hettle
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.49
Joelle Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Lynn Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.05
Karen McNairy
published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-06-22Won 2–1
L#2 DoublesMarie Picard / Kathryn Smith vs Liz DelPlato / Nenette Olson6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Crystal Bryant7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErica Tsuruta / Lynn Sosa vs Penny Birkhofer / Katherine Kralj6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2019-06-19Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Janae Pyle7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Marie Picard vs Linda Barker / Reidun Zander6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesColleen Hamilton / Nancy Atkins vs Diana Callaway / Peg McClendon6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2019-06-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKirsten Giacomini / Brandy Horwitz vs Terri Bashkingy / Sue Edmonds6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Carrie Willis7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Schlickeiser vs Theresa Berry / Jill Derry6-3, 6-4
2019-06-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKirsten Giacomini / Brandy Horwitz vs Kyoko Adcock / Kay Dobashi6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Kim Regalado4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart vs Dalika Crawford / Claire Thayer6-3, 6-0
2019-05-18Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesAmy Jean / Marie Picard vs Amiee Moyers / Juan Li6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa vs Kaelin Teo / Tao Hua1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Timothea Barnatan6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Rochelle Hart vs Cathy Gatzke / Jalaja Uppili2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-05-11Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Kay Dobashi / Chizuru Watanabe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Judith Kobin6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2019-04-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Jean / Marie Picard vs Julie Hester / Kristi Vargas6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Kathleen Budnick6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Kathleen Schlickeiser vs Heather Dudley / Lisa West4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-04-19Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa vs Tao Hua / Kaelin Teo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Kristin Spear6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKirsten Giacomini / Brandy Horwitz vs Amiee Moyers / Juan Li6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Lori Hamilton6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%97%3%
3.88
4
Kirsten Giacomini
93W–48L career
0%97%3%
3.83
4
Kristen Benkstein
132W–55L career
0%99%1%
3.83
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
4
Aracelia Hettle
71W–44L career
22%78%0%
3.56
4
Joelle Lewis
37W–46L career
39%61%0%
3.49
4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
4
Lynn Sosa
73W–57L career
48%52%0%
3.45
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.