Teams

Selma Wilson

2026 Selma Tri-Level 18 & Over · Women's 4.0-3.5-3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-08vs SE - PearceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Simpkins / Keisha Wilson vs Katie Barrette / Sid Utsey7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJessica Wheeler / Taylor Hale vs Kennedy Bergeron / Samantha Jones4-6, 2-6
2026-08-08vs SE - PearceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKatie Barrette / Rebecca Stewart vs Landon Posey / Jessica Spivey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMorgan Bearden / Kendall Smith vs Samantha Jones / Kennedy Bergeron2-6, 2-6
2026-07-25vs SE - PearceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Rebecca Stewart vs Leigh Chappelle / Sid Utsey6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaigan Bearden / Morgan Bearden vs Kennedy Bergeron / Samantha Jones0-6, 1-6
2026-07-23vs SE - PearceLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Katie Barrette vs Leigh Chappelle / Sid Utsey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelinda Fuller / Keisha Wilson vs Rachel Todd / Amy Jones6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatherine Thomas / Taylor Hale vs Jennifer Dobbs / Kennedy Bergeron3-6, 2-6
2026-07-17vs SE - PearceLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Keisha Wilson vs Leigh Chappelle / Jessica Spivey5-7, 4-6
2026-07-14vs SE - Simpkins/StewartLost 02
L#1 DoublesSid Utsey / Katie Barrette vs Kim Simpkins / Jennifer Roberts4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTaylor Hale / Jennifer Rowell Jones vs Kennedy Bergeron / Catherine Thomas4-6, 2-6
2026-07-11vs SE - PearceLost 02
L#2 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Katie Barrette vs Callen Free / Sid Utsey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Hale / Jennifer Rowell Jones vs Kennedy Bergeron / Jennifer Dobbs4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 4.0-3.5-3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SE - Pearce31751197
2Selma Wilson135715125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Amanda Henry
published 3.5
3.31
Keisha Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Katie Barrette
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Melinda Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Jennifer Rowell Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Taylor Hale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Morgan Bearden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Henry
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Keisha Wilson
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Katie Barrette
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Melinda Fuller
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.88
Jennifer Rowell Jones
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Taylor Hale
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Morgan Bearden
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.