Teams

TSR: 40Love

2023 40&Over Women · 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2023-07-11vs Southern: Atomic TaconicLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Curcio / Nena Beram vs Lori Kaplan / Jennifer Weaver4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAndrea Moss / Kyla Hart vs Suzanne McLeod / Susan Leary1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Choi / Nancy Yi vs Carrie Frith / Gail Lynch1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMary Sniffen / Phyllis WAN-HUEN vs Lisa Sippel / Mary Mondello6-7, 4-6
2023-06-27vs Match PointSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatherine Curcio / Nena Beram vs Kristi Greco / Carolyn Pinheiro6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAimee Heinly vs Kelly Reid2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Lois / Kyla Hart vs Marie Fredericks / Kelly Ryan2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Bamford / Andria McKenna vs Tammy Sampson / Tina Hartley7-6, 6-3
2023-06-21vs Match PointSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebecca Marino / Barbara Moran vs Deirdre Gaspari / Gina Palconet7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPhyllis WAN-HUEN vs Sharon Valencia6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNena Beram / Katherine Curcio vs Kristi Greco / Tammy Sampson6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAimee Heinly / Nancy Yi vs Elisabeth Weiss / Marianne Melielo3-6, 4-6
2023-06-15vs Chestnut Ridge: NetflexLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Natalie Woolwine vs Joan Veteska / Judy Rutcofsky3-6, 6-7
2023-06-13vs Southern: Atomic TaconicWon 31
L#1 DoublesJoanna Dejesus / Nena Beram vs Myndi Hill / Carlisle Stockton2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPhyllis WAN-HUEN vs Karolina Hart6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Curcio / Andrea Moss vs Kimberly Lee / Carrie Frith6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Bamford / Aimee Heinly vs Karen Ventosa / Ashley Gregor4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-08vs WCC: The Westchester ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Sharon Pratt vs Randi Siegel / Gabrielle Zilkha4-6, 4-6
2023-06-01vs Chappaqua Swim & TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesDana Bol / Jennifer Corrado vs Danielle Powers / Stephanie Calman2-6, 6-7
2023-05-25vs RRC NetworkersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Sharon Pratt vs Orly Miller / Andrea Hessekiel7-6, 7-5
2023-05-23vs Southern: Atomic TaconicLost 04
L#1 DoublesPhyllis WAN-HUEN / Karlene Wright vs Myndi Hill / Gail Lynch3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJoanna Dejesus vs Melissa Berardis7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Bol / Andrea Moss vs Lori Kaplan / Lori Calat5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Denicholas / Jennifer Corrado vs Mary Berezowsky / Barbara Wilson2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMelissa Berardis / Phyllis WAN-HUEN vs Erin Lange / Laura Chilton6-3, 6-4
2023-05-16vs Match PointWon 31
L#1 DoublesRobin Lois / Andrea Moss vs Deirdre Gaspari / Kristi Greco4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJoanna Dejesus vs Kelly Reid6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBarbara Moran / Rebecca Marino vs Stacey Rossicci-Vale / Tammy Sampson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Denicholas / Jennifer Corrado vs Marianne Melielo / Andrea Piehler6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDana Bol vs Lauren Rosen1-6, 1-6
2023-05-02vs Southern: Atomic TaconicLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoanna Dejesus / Jessica Kenaston vs Barbara Wilson / Jillian Muro0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPhyllis WAN-HUEN vs Kellie Mee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNena Beram / Karlene Wright vs Suzanne McLeod / Elizabeth Leary6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Moss / Andria McKenna vs Karolina Hart / Myndi Hill6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TSR: 40Love07111739282
2Southern: Atomic Taconic0824821220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Phyllis WAN-HUEN
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.80
Melissa Bamford
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Andria McKenna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Katherine Curcio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Rebecca Marino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Barbara Moran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Dana Bol
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Jennifer Corrado
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.42
Andrea Moss
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.33
Robin Lois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Alexandra Choi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Aimee Heinly
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Nancy Yi
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.16
Joanna Dejesus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jessica Kenaston
published
Karlene Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kyla Hart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nena Beram
published
Susan Denicholas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Dejesus + Phyllis WAN-HUEN4248% games+4.1% vs expected
Dana Bol + Jennifer Corrado4449% games+2.3% vs expected
Barbara Moran + Rebecca Marino5653% games−1.1% vs expected
Andrea Moss + Robin Lois2537% games−1.3% vs expected
Joanna Dejesus + Jessica Kenaston3255% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Yi + Kyla Hart3259% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Yi + Alexandra Choi1442% gamesnot enough data
Andria McKenna + Aimee Heinly3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Phyllis WAN-HUEN
109W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Melissa Bamford
173W–78L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Andria McKenna
48W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Curcio
40W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Rebecca Marino
31W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Barbara Moran
55W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Dana Bol
82W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.60
4
Jennifer Corrado
128W–170L career · 6 lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
4
Andrea Moss
39W–50L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Robin Lois
21W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Alexandra Choi
34W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Aimee Heinly
56W–54L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Nancy Yi
33W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Joanna Dejesus
58W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Jessica Kenaston
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karlene Wright
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyla Hart
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nena Beram
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Denicholas
29W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.