Teams

CORTA/Sheila Ezell

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 65 & Over - Summer · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-13vs Liscar-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Ezell / Becky Overby vs Tracy Smith / Kathryn English6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMissy Mizzell / Valorie Harbour vs Louise Dillard / Ruth Curtis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Clay Smith / Charisse Hill vs Tulan Hall / Janet Jenkins6-1, 6-2
2025-04-26vs Liscar-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheila Ezell / Annette Vickery vs Louise Dillard / Rena Wilson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesValorie Harbour / Rhonda Ramey vs Tracy Smith / Donna Akin6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSally Clay Smith / Charisse Hill vs Leslie Reiney / Ruth Curtis6-4, 6-4
2025-04-12vs Liscar-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheila Ezell / Annette Vickery vs Kathryn English / Donna Akin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatti Brooks / Rhonda Ramey vs Joi Liscar / Tulan Hall6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSally Clay Smith / Missy Mizzell vs Ruth Curtis / Janet Jenkins6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Rhonda Ramey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Missy Mizzell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Charisse Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Annette Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Dorris Bishop
published
3.06
Sheila Ezell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Sally Clay Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Becky Overby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Valorie Harbour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patti Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Hamm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Overby + Sheila Ezell3251% gamesnot enough data
Becky Overby + Sally Clay Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Annette Vickery + Missy Mizzell303 matchesnot enough data
Sally Clay Smith + Sheila Ezell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Ramey
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Missy Mizzell
23W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Charisse Hill
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Annette Vickery
13W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Dorris Bishop
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Sheila Ezell
52W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Sally Clay Smith
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Becky Overby
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Valorie Harbour
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Patti Brooks
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Hamm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.