Teams

V - Royal Court Queens

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WE · Ventura - Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-08vs V - Out of WACLost 01
L#2 DoublesClair Telford / Mariana Sullivan vs Keely McKnight / Heather Morganson1-6, 1-6
2023-12-02vs V - Malibu Bu-lieversSplit 11
L#2 DoublesClair Telford / Mariana Sullivan vs Maureen Weston / Erin von Watts0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Tavasoli / Patti Wilson vs Narcis Lobl / Haleh Emrani6-3, 6-3
2023-11-05vs V - Mission Oaks Miracles!Won 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Wilson / Kim Tavasoli vs Patricia Francisco / Deborah Kerr-Orlik4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-28vs V - Mission Oaks Smart AcesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKimberly Hasenauer / Mariana Sullivan vs Madeleine Lindvall / Sharon Erickson5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatti Wilson / Kim Tavasoli vs Lisa Yoshimura / Helina Wu1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-21vs V - Arroyo Vista HurricanesLost 01
L#2 DoublesTeri Terrusa / Kim Tavasoli vs Nancy Pierson / Wendy Schoenburg3-6, 2-6
2023-10-14vs V - Royally FunWon 10
W#3 DoublesMariana Sullivan / Therese Doyle vs Linda Chan / Teresa Zobrist6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Courtney Arbuckle
published 4.5
3.83
Erica Bachtel
published
3.69
Rachel Barlow
published
3.68
Ashley Tanger
published 4
3.66
Mariana Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Teri Terrusa
published
3.60
Dorothy Lewis
published
3.46
Yolanda Johnson
published
3.41
Patti Wilson
published
3.40
Kimberly Hasenauer
published
3.24
Clair Telford
published 3.5
3.22
Kim Tavasoli
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Tavasoli + Patti Wilson3249% games+8.0% vs expected
Mariana Sullivan + Rachel Barlow2447% games−9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Arbuckle
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
Erica Bachtel
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.83
Rachel Barlow
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Ashley Tanger
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Mariana Sullivan
95W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Teri Terrusa
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Dorothy Lewis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Yolanda Johnson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Patti Wilson
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Kimberly Hasenauer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Clair Telford
17W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Kim Tavasoli
85W–106L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.