Teams

SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SA8

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.72 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesStacey Iwata / Tammy Pronenko vs Lisa Lerg / Jenniffer Wong7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeann McCormick / Gail Scott vs Yolanda Barocio / Maryann Yamamoto7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracy Lee / Angelica Ramos vs Mae Huey / Tanya Martin6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesStacey Iwata / Lorene Miller vs Rebecca Escandon / Susan Miller3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLorene Miller / Theresa Winterburn vs Aram Hamidi / Sandra Manion4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Obst / Theresa Winterburn vs Jami Johnson / Suzanne JOhnson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJosephine Chow / Krislea Manuva vs Jennifer Miller / Margery Ruffalo4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRosie Bonilla / Elena Saydah vs Valiere Byrnes / Regina Cheung6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJosephine Chow / Alisa MacKey vs Shelley McMahon / Pamela Rosenberg1-6, 1-6
2022-10-30vs SGV Dare Doubles-Hofstad-WN/ SU8Won 30
W#1 DoublesTammy Pronenko / Viviana Kim vs Franciz Bragg / Ronalyn Raymundo7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeann McCormick / Theresa Winterburn vs Ellie Wei / Sherie Paulson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngelica Ramos / Josephine Chow vs Leticia Arreola / Darlene Scott2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Winterburn / Rosie Bonilla vs Irina Abadzheva / Carla Denker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesViviana Kim / Mary Chau vs Holly Lieberenz / Karen Vidal5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJosephine Chow / Elena Saydah vs Satsuki Yamashita / Kelly Moss1-6, 0-6
2022-09-24vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su12Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStacey Iwata / Britta Hurst vs Lauren Nicole Finke / Katherine Wu0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGail Scott / Theresa Winterburn vs Judy Su / Brittany Whyte1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAngelica Ramos / Viviana Kim vs Karla Garcia / Cynthia Garcia2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesStacey Iwata / Tracy Lee vs Alison Harma / MINA OKAMOTO3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElena Saydah / Angelica Ramos vs Carol Choy / Loretta Peng3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Obst / Josephine Chow vs Nicole Winslow / Maria Bailey2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Deann McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Angelica Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Tammy Pronenko
published
3.76
Stacey Iwata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Lorene Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Krislea Manuva
published
3.59
Joanna Aguinaldo
published
3.44
Karen Obst
published
3.44
Viviana Kim
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Mary Chau
published
3.33
Alisa MacKey
published 3.5
3.31
Theresa Winterburn
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Gail Scott
published 3.5
3.06
Elena Saydah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.63
Josephine Chow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorene Miller + Stacey Iwata603753% games+3.1% vs expected
Josephine Chow + Angelica Ramos224 matchesnot enough data
Viviana Kim + Angelica Ramos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deann McCormick
102W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Angelica Ramos
103W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Stacey Iwata
87W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Lorene Miller
95W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Krislea Manuva
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Joanna Aguinaldo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Karen Obst
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Viviana Kim
82W–134L career · 3 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
Mary Chau
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Alisa MacKey
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Theresa Winterburn
61W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Gail Scott
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Elena Saydah
123W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Josephine Chow
145W–300L career · 9 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.