CCC-Reeves

usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published —

3.14

usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published —

3.06

Sherry Dubose

usually #4 Doubles 100% · published —

3.04

usually #1 Singles 48%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.04

usually #1 Singles 48%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.01

usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3

3.01

usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3

3.00

usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #4 Doubles 28% · published 3.5

3.00

usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #4 Doubles 28% · published 3.5

2.96

Maggie Bennett

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

2.94

Lynn McGee

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published —

2.88

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published —

2.88

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published —

2.88

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

2.88

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

2.85

Meredith West

usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published —

2.84

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published —

2.84

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published —

2.79

Kara Lewis

usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published —

2.77

Amy Britt

usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.76

Shantha McDonald

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published —

2.75

Meg Nivens

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Britt SAWYER + Margaret Gaines	10–4	56% games	+6.7% vs expected
Cathy Cobb + Melanie Abernathy	4–2	53% games	+5.4% vs expected
Allyson Reeves + Melanie Abernathy	14–10	53% games	+4.9% vs expected
Christine Allen + Maggie Bennett	4–6	48% games	+3.2% vs expected
Ali Thompson + Julie McCoy	8–2	63% games	+3.1% vs expected
Lynn McGee + Allyson Reeves	2–3	47% games	+1.3% vs expected
Brandi Barber + Julie McCoy	3–8	41% games	−5.0% vs expected
Maggie Bennett + Elizabeth Causey	2–6	40% games	−7.9% vs expected

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Margaret Gaines

34W–18L career · 20 lines in 2026

<1%<1%>99%

3.47

3.5

Britt SAWYER

13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%79%20%

3.38

3.5

Brandi Barber

12W–20L career · 14 lines in 2026

1%84%15%

3.36

—

Elizabeth Causey

20W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

3.30

3.5

Christine Allen

8W–22L career · 16 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

3.25

—

Pamela Hoosh

4W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026

9%90%1%

3.19

—

19W–28L career · 31 lines in 2026

17%83%<1%

3.14

—

19W–28L career · 31 lines in 2026

17%83%<1%

3.14

—

Sherry Dubose

1W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026

34%66%<1%

3.06

27W–30L career · 21 lines in 2026

<1%39%61%

3.04

27W–30L career · 21 lines in 2026

<1%39%61%

3.04

29W–26L career · 19 lines in 2026

<1%48%52%

3.01

29W–26L career · 19 lines in 2026

<1%48%52%

3.01

3.5

18W–21L career · 29 lines in 2026

49%51%<1%

3.00

3.5

18W–21L career · 29 lines in 2026

49%51%<1%

3.00

—

Maggie Bennett

13W–28L career · 15 lines in 2026

61%39%<1%

2.96

—

Lynn McGee

12W–28L career · 10 lines in 2026

<1%66%34%

2.94

—

4W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%79%21%

2.88

—

4W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%79%21%

2.88

—

27W–21L career · 16 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

2.88

—

27W–21L career · 16 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

2.88

—

Meredith West

7W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026

1%86%14%

2.85

—

10W–23L career · 10 lines in 2026

1%87%13%

2.84

—