Teams

Sarasota/Weitzel/40&Over3.5M

2023 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 3.5 M Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-11vs LWR ArmstrongLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoel Pyser / Joe Malave vs Craig Bliss / Andrew Tasnady5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-18vs LWR ArmstrongWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Malave / Scott Temple vs Matthew Crawford / Raj Khubchandani6-1, 6-3
2023-02-04vs Payne Park ConantWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe Malave / Dustin Keith vs Conrad Penner / Larry White6-4, 6-0
2023-01-28vs LWR ArmstrongWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnthony Homer / Joe Malave vs John Rain / David Zandi6-1, 6-3
2023-01-14vs LWR ArmstrongWon 10
W#2 DoublesGrover Windsor / Joe Malave vs William Byxbee / Matthew Crawford6-3, 6-4
2023-01-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesBarney Akierman / Joe Malave vs Rodney Robinson / Conrad Penner6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Barney Akierman
published 4
3.69
Marc Solomon
published
3.63
Joe Malave
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.57
Nader Massoumi
published
3.46
Grover Windsor
published 3.5
3.45
Dustin Keith
published 3.5
3.33
Brent Klein
published 3.5
3.31
Scott Temple
published
3.30
Joel Pyser
published
Anthony Homer
published 3.5
3.23
James Protigal
published 3.5
2.94
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Robin Klein
published
Wallace Klein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grover Windsor + Joel Pyser4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barney Akierman
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Marc Solomon
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.69
4
Joe Malave
127W–103L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Nader Massoumi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Grover Windsor
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Dustin Keith
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Brent Klein
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Scott Temple
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
Joel Pyser
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Anthony Homer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
James Protigal
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Robin Klein
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wallace Klein
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.