Teams

GEPTA/40&over/4.0W/Maese/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.81 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Alejandra Ostos
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 44% · published 4
3.81
Allison Glass
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Artemisa Ortega
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.64
Beatrice Maese
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.61
Bianca Loya
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.25
Carla Yepo
usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.14
Cynthia Canales
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.02
Belinda Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Erica McFarland
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Erin Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Hilda Finn
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Imelda Angulo
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Jammie Price
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rocio Molina
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Wendy Felix
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bianca Loya + Allison Glass6065% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Beatrice Maese1444% gamesnot enough data
Erica McFarland + Carla Yepo5066% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Bianca Loya224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandra Ostos
51W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Allison Glass
31W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Artemisa Ortega
51W–49L career · 18 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Beatrice Maese
74W–86L career · 15 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Bianca Loya
39W–31L career · 11 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carla Yepo
50W–56L career · 20 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia Canales
24W–37L career · 14 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Belinda Fernandez
54W–62L career · type A · 13 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Erica McFarland
28W–16L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erin Rivera
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Helga Sauza
74W–41L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hilda Finn
81W–96L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Imelda Angulo
29W–34L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jammie Price
47W–41L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rocio Molina
78W–48L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Felix
24W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.