← Teams

CGM-Borchers/Rey

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Diana Almy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.76
Lisa Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.56
Hong Jones
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Becky Rey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-11-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJill Sather / Becky Rey vs Sandy Garry / Chris Ramsower-Pearlstein6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Lisa Lyon vs Monique Eldridge / Minou Chau6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Hong Jones vs Rebecca Jacobs / Noriko Satake6-2, 6-1
2023-11-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Minou Chau / Monique Eldridge6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Cindy Rushall vs Janelle Laurila / Jill Lee4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Nenette Olson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Mary Anderson / Janet Tabor6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Jill Sather vs Trina Denson / Amy Leahy6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Lyon / Cindy Rushall vs Rebecca Redding / June Wu6-2, 6-0
2023-11-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Karen Sullivan / Xia Wu6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBecky Rey / Jill Sather vs Launi Smith / Jennifer Schmelling7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNaomi Steinberg / Cindy Rushall vs Linda Fosberg / Linda Graham6-4, 6-2
2023-10-28Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesYumiko Pike / Nenette Olson vs Sue Gregoire / Cathrine Olander6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Jill Sather vs Yuko Hopman / Deanna Lautenbach6-3, 7-6
2023-10-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Jill Sather vs Jennifer Devoe / Lisa Handley6-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Rushall / Hong Jones vs Cynthia McPhee / Elise Orban6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNenette Olson / Naomi Steinberg vs Terri Pickard / Kim Stevens6-4, 7-5
2023-10-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesYumiko Pike / Deborah Borchers vs Lisa Handley / Jennifer Devoe6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Sather / Diana Almy vs Laura Luthi / Cynthia McPhee6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBecky Rey / Tami Oglesby vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJill Sather / Tami Oglesby vs Anne McCroskey / Xia Wu6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Cindy Rushall vs Launi Smith / Rhonda Kessinger6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Naomi Steinberg vs Donna Feuerherdt / Linda Graham6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Diana Almy
50W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Lisa Lyon
91W–68L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Hong Jones
26W–50L career
23%77%0%
3.56
4
Becky Rey
26W–49L career
43%57%0%
3.47
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.