Teams

CSRATA/David Thornton

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring '26 · Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-01vs CCRC KeenlyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Skinner / David Fulton vs Warren Elam / Paul Donovan6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark West / Jeff Lasure vs Kevin Keenly / Michael Lacey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Thornton / Craig Jones vs Len Johnson / John Longo6-1, 6-1
2026-04-26vs CCRC KeenlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Thornton / Alex Skinner vs Len Johnson / John Longo6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGlenn Mankin / David Fulton vs Michael Lacey / Warren Elam6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMark West / John Mallory vs Kevin Keenly / Paul Donovan6-0, 7-6
2026-04-22vs CCRC KeenlyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Lasure / Glenn Mankin vs Kevin Keenly / Michael Lacey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark West / Alex Skinner vs Len Johnson / Paul Donovan6-2, 6-1
2026-04-19vs CCRC KeenlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Mallory / Glenn Mankin vs Len Johnson / John Longo6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMark West / Alex Skinner vs Kevin Keenly / Paul Donovan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Fulton / Gordon Walters vs Michael Lacey / Warren Elam6-0, 6-3
2026-04-15vs CCRC KeenlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Thornton / Alex Skinner vs John Longo / Len Johnson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGlenn Mankin / Jeff Lasure vs Kevin Keenly / Michael Lacey6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGordon Walters / David Fulton vs Warren Elam / Paul Donovan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CSRATA/David Thornton50141385
2CCRC Keenly0511428175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
David Fulton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.94
Alex Skinner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Glenn Mankin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
David Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Craig Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Jeff Lasure
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gordon Walters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Mallory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Fulton
10W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Alex Skinner
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Glenn Mankin
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
David Thornton
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Craig Jones
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Lasure
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Gordon Walters
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Mallory
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.