Teams

CCC

2026 Winter Blast Doubles · Women 2.5

3 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-02-11vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Lever / Lori Wilson vs Carrie Neal / Jessica Gibney3-6, 3-6
2026-01-23vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Sadowski / Lori Wilson vs Deborah Cashion / Blair Scheepers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-13vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Lever / Lori Sadowski vs Mollyrose Wright / Jessica Gibney2-6, 4-6
2026-01-06vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Brindle / Lori Wilson vs Jessica Gibney / Deborah Cashion3-6, 4-6
2026-01-04vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Lever / Lori Wilson vs Blair Scheepers / Carrie Neal3-6, 5-7
2025-12-14vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Brindle / Lori Sadowski vs Mollyrose Wright / Blair Scheepers1-6, 2-6
2025-12-12vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Lever / Tammy Brindle vs Deborah Cashion / Carrie Neal3-6, 1-6
2025-12-07vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Sadowski / Lori Wilson vs Blair Scheepers / Jessica Gibney3-6, 1-6
2025-11-17vs The Wright TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Lever / Lori Sadowski vs Mollyrose Wright / Carrie Neal3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Wright Team9090152
2CCC090918108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.29
Laura Lever
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Tammy Brindle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Lori Sadowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Lever + Tammy Brindle3251% games−2.9% vs expected
Laura Lever + Lori Sadowski0630% games−13.6% vs expected
Tammy Brindle + Lori Sadowski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Lever
14W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Tammy Brindle
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Lori Sadowski
1W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.