Teams

VTC-Bala

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

1 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-11-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Burak / Teresa Darling vs Marianne Panowicz / Darlene Staley6-1, 6-1
2019-11-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Cecilia Nguyen vs Marjorie Halbach / Cynthia Ross-Brockett7-6, 6-1
2019-10-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Trish Carder vs Jean Jensen / Kathy Haugh6-2, 6-2
2019-10-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Trish Carder vs Ivy Lane / Teresa Metke6-0, 7-5
2019-10-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Pam Garofalo vs Ann-Marie Lundberg / Suzanne Haberland6-2, 6-1
2019-09-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Gail Vogel vs Carolyn Adatto / Pearl Lee6-2, 6-1
2019-09-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Darling / Gail Vogel vs Anna Browne / Elaine Sibley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.