Teams

FLYHS BARTHELMES

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-30vs LTFCS HAMMERLost 02
L#1 DoublesTisha Hickerson / Katherine Gausepohl vs Susan Shaink / Lisa Ostly3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenny Elston / Michele Noonan vs Sarah Lueckeman / Dana Kennedy0-6, 1-6
2024-05-20vs CSCC TAFOLLAWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Biewenga / Andrea Murray vs Sally Martin / Sutton Spanton6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Gausepohl / Tisha Hickerson vs Paula Hanson / Patrice Tafolla6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLea List vs Julie Davis6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-13vs CCOC BONICELLILost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Biewenga / Lea List vs Nina Ballenger / Barbara Jean Knorr0-6, 4-6
2024-05-08vs PBCP BARNHILLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Biewenga / Andrea Murray vs Ana Bhagat / Vanessa Madrid4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Gausepohl / Tisha Hickerson vs Brigitte Juarez / Rochelle Wristen6-0, 6-3
2024-04-29vs CCW MOLost 12
W#1 DoublesTisha Hickerson / Lea List vs Irene Mo / Debra Short6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Biewenga vs Karen Shuman1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDenny Elston vs Callie Scott5-7, 0-6
2024-04-22vs CSRC RAMSEYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLea List / Lacy Utterback vs Cheri Ramsey / Jennifer Peck2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTisha Hickerson vs Audrey Hillyer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Tisha Hickerson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.07
Kristy Pring
published
2.90
Lea List
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Marilyn McGee
published
Alice Bauder
published 3
2.74
Joy Barthelmes
published
2.65
Melissa Biewenga
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.59
Michele Noonan
published
2.27
Denny Elston
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Reagan Lenhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea List + Tisha Hickerson10256% games+23.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tisha Hickerson
47W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Kristy Pring
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Lea List
35W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Marilyn McGee
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alice Bauder
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joy Barthelmes
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Melissa Biewenga
35W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Michele Noonan
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
2.5
Denny Elston
49W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Reagan Lenhart
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.