Teams

Bomba Squad

2024 Virginia Beach Adult 18 & Over · Virginia Beach Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-20vs PACC - LongLost 01
L#2 DoublesRoland Nave / Shaun Sabio vs Adam Long / Tommy VanDaniker4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-05-06vs PACC - LongWon 10
W#2 DoublesRenald Castro / Shaun Sabio vs Tommy VanDaniker / Thomas Cox6-2, 6-1
2024-04-29vs PACC - LongWon 10
W#2 DoublesShaun Sabio / Renald Castro vs Daniel Morrall / Monte Lehmkuhler6-4, 7-6
2024-04-22vs PACC - LongLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenald Castro / Shaun Sabio vs Tommy VanDaniker / Thomas Cox6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs PACC - LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesShaun Sabio / Renald Castro vs Monte Lehmkuhler / Edwin Crandley7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Rogelio Valdez
published
3.70
Shaun Sabio
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Matthew Dey
published
3.55
William McNicholas
published
3.45
Roland Nave
published
3.35
Christopher Dimaya
published 3.5
3.32
Renald Castro
published
3.19
Emmanuel Gonzales
published
Jonathan Concio
published
Miguel Dela Cruz
published
Patrick Lonning
published
Rudolph McIntosh
published
Samuel Holley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Holley + Matthew Dey6265% games+7.3% vs expected
Roland Nave + Renald Castro5458% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rogelio Valdez
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Shaun Sabio
52W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Matthew Dey
36W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
William McNicholas
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Roland Nave
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Christopher Dimaya
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Renald Castro
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Emmanuel Gonzales
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Jonathan Concio
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miguel Dela Cruz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Lonning
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rudolph McIntosh
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samuel Holley
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.