Teams

Lucky Shots

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.96 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-05vs Alley CatsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMiho May / Rumiko Wong vs Lori Adolewski / Barbara Furugen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Chun / Bonnie Moy vs Krisna Suryanata / Sonavie Ong6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebby Shin / Charleen Nishimura vs Marge Bernice / Elisabeth Smith5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Rally RascalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Rufo / PJ Ellison vs Jacqueline Ornellas / Darlene Chang4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRumiko Wong / Miho May vs Sumi Matsumiya / Sharon Vidal0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Hashimoto / Susan Shingle vs Karen Howes / Becky Miller0-6, 0-6
2024-04-21vs High FivesWon 30
W#1 DoublesPJ Ellison / Margaret Rufo vs Rosemary Lau / Mary Kitsu6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebby Shin / Rumiko Wong vs Rosalinda Cooper / Norene Ihori6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Chun / Tilda Wong vs Saima Makhdoom / Diane Takara6-1, 6-1
2024-04-14vs No BagelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesBonnie Moy / Tilda Wong vs Renee S / Sharon Stehlik0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPJ Ellison / Susan Shingle vs Anna Lee / Lois Saruwatari7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Hashimoto / Karen Yamaguchi vs Celia Shen / Glenda Cockett6-2, 6-4
2024-04-07vs Dig DeepWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Chun / PJ Ellison vs Nancy Nagamine / Susie Jannuzzi4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDebby Shin / Tilda Wong vs Lisa Gentry / Stacy Ray5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Hashimoto / Karen Yamaguchi vs Joyce Trask / Ann Gardetto2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-24vs Happy Happy Hour!Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Moy / Debby Shin vs Ann Choy / Charlotte Loo1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMiho May / Susan Shingle vs Alicia Mcclaverty / Jamie Pang3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharleen Nishimura / Carolyn Izumigawa vs Janice Kato / Phyllis Klein2-6, 6-7
2024-03-17vs Dare DoublesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMiho May / Rumiko Wong vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Helen Ramos2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Izumigawa / Susan Shingle vs Teri Lathrop / Barbara Farr1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Karen Yamaguchi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Margaret Rufo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Rumiko Wong
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Carolyn Izumigawa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Jacqueline Chun
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Miho May
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
PJ Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Debby Shin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Charleen Nishimura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Tilda Wong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Bonnie Moy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Charlotte Hashimoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Susan Shingle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miho May + Rumiko Wong4945% games+2.9% vs expected
Bonnie Moy + PJ Ellison131252% games+2.7% vs expected
Charleen Nishimura + PJ Ellison2448% games+0.2% vs expected
Charleen Nishimura + Bonnie Moy4555% games−8.8% vs expected
Susan Shingle + Miho May4345% games−8.8% vs expected
Charleen Nishimura + Tilda Wong1639% games−13.5% vs expected
Miho May + Charlotte Hashimoto21131% games−15.6% vs expected
Susan Shingle + PJ Ellison5546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Yamaguchi
124W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Margaret Rufo
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Rumiko Wong
65W–74L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Carolyn Izumigawa
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jacqueline Chun
47W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Miho May
37W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
PJ Ellison
45W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Debby Shin
74W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Charleen Nishimura
17W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Tilda Wong
28W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Bonnie Moy
82W–135L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Charlotte Hashimoto
8W–20L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Susan Shingle
40W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.