Teams

COLLIER/Barnard/Mix18&over7.0Mix

2025 Collier Mixed 18 & Over Spring · Mixed 18 & over 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-17vs Saturnia Lakes / FischelWon 21
W#1 DoublesSUE BECK / Ryan Wells vs Collins Pennie / Ira Olivos6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Laggis / Mike van Parys vs Anita Susco / Gian Fidanli3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDaniela de Pietto / Massimo Bugliosi vs Kristie Kederis / Ram Kumar6-2, 6-2
2025-05-11vs Bay Colony / GravanteWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Wells / Mara Mazza vs Steve Miron / Brenda Shields6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMike van Parys / Emily Burstein vs Jeff Falvo / Lesley Falvo6-1, 6-0
2025-05-03vs Cambier / DunayerWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Burstein / Jordan Rieks vs Howard Bramson / Lorraine Kaplan6-2, 6-0
2025-04-19vs Bay Colony / GravanteWon 10
W#2 DoublesJordan Rieks / Mara Mazza vs Karen Kalmanson / Roger Dolden7-5, 6-3
2025-04-05vs Marco YMCA / WashakWon 10
W#2 DoublesSUE BECK / Jordan Rieks vs Ed Coringrato / Inge Lund6-4, 6-1
2025-03-29vs Cambier / DunayerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDoug Clough / Mara Mazza vs Robert Clark / Carol Cohen7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRick Barnard / Emily Burstein vs Bonnie Dunayer / George Robb6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Massimo Bugliosi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Juraj Zeman
published
3.58
SUE BECK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Natalia Zeman
published
3.56
Jordan Rieks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Emily Burstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Ryan Wells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Susan Flagg
published
3.37
Mara Mazza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Chris Flagg
published 3.5
3.26
Daniela de Pietto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Margaret Laggis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Patty Branthover
published
Doug Clough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mike van Parys
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Barnard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalia Zeman + Juraj Zeman12171% games+19.8% vs expected
Jordan Rieks + SUE BECK10074% gamesnot enough data
Susan Flagg + Chris Flagg5259% gamesnot enough data
Massimo Bugliosi + Daniela de Pietto4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Massimo Bugliosi
28W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Juraj Zeman
32W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
SUE BECK
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Natalia Zeman
45W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Jordan Rieks
59W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.56
Emily Burstein
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Ryan Wells
38W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Susan Flagg
90W–68L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Mara Mazza
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Chris Flagg
7W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Daniela de Pietto
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Margaret Laggis
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Patty Branthover
18W–36L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Doug Clough
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mike van Parys
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rick Barnard
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.