Teams

OC Tennis Addicts- FVTC- Tommy Le

2022 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.21 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-10vs OC LLW Boot Camp - FVTC - TranLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirtine Yang / Anil Vootkur vs Jenny Tsai / Dean Ta4-6, 3-6
2022-10-09vs OC LLW Boot Camp - FVTC - TranLost 01
L#1 DoublesHatien Nguyen / Anil Vootkur vs Frank Tran / Tai Sisson1-6, 1-6
2022-10-02vs OC Woodbridge - Sabrina Sun 4pmLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Springer / Kirtine Yang vs Daniel Beres / Alissa Ahlman3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Nguyen / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Jon Wang / Shannon Stolaruk2-6, 2-6
2022-09-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Catipay / Jeffrey Chen vs Stephanie Chung / Son Nguyen7-6, 6-0
2022-08-21vs OC Los Cab - CalvinLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Dana / Hatien Nguyen vs Ben Phan / Julie Le6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2022-08-14vs OC Woodbridge - Sabrina Sun 4pmWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Springer / Kirtine Yang vs Scott Tiernan / Alissa Ahlman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnil Vootkur / Christina Catipay vs Quoc Tran / Preeti Gokhale4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Kevin Springer
published
4.20
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Kirtine Yang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Christina Catipay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Anil Vootkur
published 4
3.84
Hatien Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Alin Curtean
published 4
3.75
Cecilia Hoang
published 4
3.62
Kat Thieu
published
3.27
Mark Gross
published
Michael Glarner
published
Sally Scott
published
Trang Phan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Springer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
84W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Kirtine Yang
71W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Christina Catipay
136W–105L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Anil Vootkur
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Hatien Nguyen
130W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Alin Curtean
23W–8L career · type M · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Cecilia Hoang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Kat Thieu
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mark Gross
29W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Michael Glarner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Scott
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trang Phan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.