Teams

MTC Vaught 11:00am

2025 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.0 Women

22 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlotte Brisley
published 3.5
3.11
Katherine Lukens
published
3.11
Nurcan Tosun
published
3.08
Kim Ekelund
published
3.04
Pam Pittenger
published
2.98
Susan Rudolph
published
2.93
Michelle Stork
published
2.90
Kris Sather
published
2.87
Amy Crowther
published 3
2.76
Maggie Lang
published
2.69
Ashley Dahms
published 3
2.68
Cindy Parsons
published 3
2.60
2.49
Dzung Nguyen
published
2.42
Jennifer Exsted
published
2.38
Hannah Holwell
published
2.35
Angie Coplan
published 2.5
2.23
Deb Lewis
published 2.5
2.17
Deb Sackrison
published 2.5
Lynlee Critz
published
Melissa Kieffer
published
Scott Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Lukens + Susan Rudolph6261% games+3.6% vs expected
Michelle Stork + Maggie Lang6357% games+2.8% vs expected
Deb Lewis + Hannah Holwell2339% games+2.2% vs expected
Dzung Nguyen + Angie Coplan213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Dahms + Angie Coplan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charlotte Brisley
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Lukens
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Nurcan Tosun
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Kim Ekelund
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Pam Pittenger
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Susan Rudolph
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Michelle Stork
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Kris Sather
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Amy Crowther
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Maggie Lang
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Ashley Dahms
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cindy Parsons
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Robin Mackell-Bradley
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Dzung Nguyen
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
Jennifer Exsted
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Hannah Holwell
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.38
2.5
Angie Coplan
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Deb Lewis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Deb Sackrison
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Lynlee Critz
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Kieffer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.