Teams

Bradshaw, Lynn

2025 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-07vs Santangelo, FayeLost 12
W#1 DoublesByron Edgecombe / Nancy Thompson vs Phyllis Keveryn / Tina Roberts5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Tew / Diane Barber vs Deborah McGehee / Robbyn Johnson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNan Dear / Tara Baugh vs Jeanna Tanner / Monique Kelly1-6, 5-7
2025-03-31vs Keyes, AngieWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa McGee / Stacey Coulter vs Angie Keyes / Susan Farris6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGayla Sanders / Teresa Dottley vs Melanie Warren / Karen Deer6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSabrina Sutherland / Kim Cumberland vs Gay Grantham / Kathie Hall6-1, 6-2
2025-03-24vs Collins, MindyWon 31
W#1 DoublesDiane Barber / Lisa Tew vs Eva Hunter / Sarah Turner7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Crisler vs Melanie Shapin0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesByron Edgecombe / Jane Turner vs Suzy Everett / Martha Hill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Thompson / Sabrina Sutherland vs Mindy Collins / Kim Pitts6-2, 6-1
2025-03-03vs Shannon, RhondaWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Crisler / Gayla Sanders vs Kim Murphey / Cheryl Sykes6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesStacey Coulter vs Michelle Jacobs2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTara Baugh / Lisa McGee vs Gena Holley / Carolyn Nordin6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Sims / Nan Dear vs Joy Cloud / Teri Norton6-4, 6-3
2025-02-24vs LeDuff, StacieWon 30
W#1 SinglesKim Cumberland vs Janice Stevens7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNan Dear / Lisa McGee vs Jean Tonnar-Seale / Leslie Royals7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Thompson / Stacey Coulter vs Elizabeth Torricelli / Virginia Pearson6-4, 6-1
2025-02-17vs Sykes, JoannaWon 20
W#1 DoublesByron Edgecombe / Teresa Dottley vs Jeannie Kellicut / Anna Dotson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGayla Sanders / Stephanie Sims vs Beverly Mann / Melanie McLeod7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Sing, StephanieWon 40
W#1 DoublesTara Baugh / Nancy Thompson vs Cindy Page / Lori Williams7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Crisler vs Jennifer Kennon2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSabrina Sutherland / Julie Thompson vs Lisa Little / Elizabeth Noone6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Tew / Diane Barber vs Jaime Kennedy / Beverly Turner6-1, 6-3
2025-02-03vs Castle, MandySplit 22
L#1 DoublesDiane Barber / Lisa Tew vs Heather Bailey / Sara Jane Cole4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Crisler vs Heather Biddle6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Turner / Byron Edgecombe vs Shannon Garlington / Lauren Ingram6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKim Cumberland / Sabrina Sutherland vs Carla Rushing / Meredith Boston6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Diane Barber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Byron Edgecombe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Teresa Dottley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Lisa Tew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Sabrina Sutherland
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Lisa McGee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Elizabeth Crisler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
2.90
Tara Baugh
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.90
Stacey Coulter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Kim Cumberland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Nan Dear
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gayla Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Barber + Lisa Tew12458% games+5.5% vs expected
Teresa Dottley + Byron Edgecombe4163% gamesnot enough data
Kim Cumberland + Sabrina Sutherland314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Dottley + Elizabeth Crisler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Barber
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Byron Edgecombe
17W–6L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Teresa Dottley
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Lisa Tew
23W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Sabrina Sutherland
15W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lisa McGee
20W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Crisler
7W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Tara Baugh
18W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Stacey Coulter
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Kim Cumberland
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Nan Dear
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Gayla Sanders
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.