Teams

PRKR GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-28vs SH GOLDWon 40
W#1 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Cindi Turchik vs Catherine Winter / Bongsook Riewe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeena Keshwani vs Michelle Markoff6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJean Shaver / Shelley Hanna vs MELISSA DRAZEN-SMITH / Rachel Wilmot6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTheresa Schuster vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-19vs SS-LT TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Leena Keshwani vs Debbie Sabato / Gina Schulz4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJean Shaver vs Audrey Simkins6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Theresa Schuster vs Sara Haynes / Kelly Kinder3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Shelley Hanna vs Angie Van Wyk / Carol Berg7-5, 6-3
2025-05-12vs PRC BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Jean Shaver vs Shawna Allen / Kate Pulliam6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLeena Keshwani vs Alyssa Shaw6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTheresa Schuster / Candace Sotwick vs Karen Bielenberg / Kirsten Despain0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAlyson Tittman vs Whitney Coakley2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShelley Hanna / Lorie Whalen vs Betsy Tapp / Laurie Lehmann7-6, 7-5
2025-05-05vs SS-LT GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Jean Shaver vs Sara Percival / Sheila Marino2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeena Keshwani vs Madison Irvine7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShelley Hanna / Alyson Tittman vs Amy Koldyke / Ingrid Burke6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Candace Sotwick vs Kelly Katsnelson / Rebecca Dalzell2-6, 2-6
2025-04-28vs CPV REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Shelley Hanna vs Susan Boerema / Sherry Wynne2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLeena Keshwani vs Ginger Schirmer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Misato Zueger - (DQ)* vs Kimberly Young / Jill Skinner4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJean Shaver vs Elean Gersack1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Schuster / Lorie Whalen vs Carrie Manion / JoAnn DelMonte1-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs PCC SILVERLost 13
W#1 DoublesLeena Keshwani / Cindi Turchik vs Nicole Benton / Barbara Lyon7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShelley Hanna vs Laura Wren2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJean Shaver / Alyson Tittman vs Donna Lollar / Nancy Meyer6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Theresa Schuster vs Carolyn Watson / Misty Candela0-6, 2-6
2025-04-14vs RRTC YELLOWLost 23
L#1 DoublesShelley Hanna / Theresa Schuster vs Kate Murphy / Siobhan Zane3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLeena Keshwani vs Yujeong Choi6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindi Turchik / Jean Shaver vs Aimee Madison / Lauren Kauffman6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesBecky Adams vs Misato Zueger - (DQ)*3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCandace Sotwick / Alyson Tittman vs Jennifer Lord / Chloe Sobczak2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Leena Keshwani
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Misato Zueger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cindi Turchik
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.62
Alyson Tittman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.25
Theresa Schuster
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Candace Sotwick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jean Shaver
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Lorie Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelley Hanna
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorie Whalen + Shelley Hanna8157% games+9.8% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Jean Shaver6455% games+6.9% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Leena Keshwani7451% games+2.8% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Shelley Hanna3351% games+2.4% vs expected
Alyson Tittman + Cindi Turchik2739% games−7.3% vs expected
Lorie Whalen + Theresa Schuster134 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Hanna + Leena Keshwani314 matchesnot enough data
Alyson Tittman + Shelley Hanna303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Leena Keshwani
129W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.22
3
Misato Zueger
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Cindi Turchik
37W–61L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alyson Tittman
115W–152L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.62
2.5
Theresa Schuster
57W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Candace Sotwick
9W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Shaver
46W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorie Whalen
18W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Hanna
37W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.