Teams

13 Willow Oaks Moehling / Stringer

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-19vs 12 Southampton BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Tia Thomas vs Beth Morris / Beth Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-17vs 7 ACAC DavisLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Tia Thomas vs Christina Aeinan Kang / Carol Pfeiffer5-7, 4-6
2022-06-25vs 9 Burkwood ClarkWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Elizabeth Boyle vs Modestine Carter / Virginia Bowie7-5, 7-6
2022-06-18vs 6 ACAC Naylor/HoeferWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Jamala Arland / Carol Hoefer6-2, 6-1
2022-06-11vs 4 Woodlake PoindexterLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Laura Vetter vs Ana Adkins / Mary Estes1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Tia Thomas
published
3.43
Mansi Shah
published
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.37
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.33
Ginnie Price
published 3.5
3.11
Meredith Miles
published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
2.98
Leslie Gayne
published
2.82
Stacy Curtis
published
2.65
Dorianne Torrice
published 3
Liz Benedetti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Heather Drew2356% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tia Thomas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Mansi Shah
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Ginnie Price
14W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Meredith Miles
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Leslie Gayne
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.98
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Dorianne Torrice
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Liz Benedetti
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.