Teams

Da.Wascher18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-03vs Br.Kelly18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMarshall Lamb / Steve Abourisk vs Joe Warenda / Gary McAuliffe1-6, 1-6
2025-04-26vs Jo.Williamson18ALost 01
L#2 SinglesDaniel Wascher vs Nishant Nayudu4-6, 0-6
2025-04-24vs Ed.King18ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Wascher / Brent Berry vs Eddie King / Jason Grieco6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs De.Farmer18A3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Abourisk / Marshall Lamb vs Willie Frierson / Paul Sherman0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Sutton / Daniel Wascher vs Ryan Schmidt / Garrett Lovejoy0-6, 3-6
2025-03-29vs Ra.Yasin18ASplit 11
L#1 SinglesDaniel Wascher vs Dipendra Shrestha0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Abourisk / Brent Berry vs Aaron Emmanuel-Overton / Michael Benecky1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Sp.Anderson18ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesNathaniel Turck / Steve Abourisk vs Jonathan Wolfe / Kevin Lindsay6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesDaniel Wascher vs Matthew Thompson2-6, 1-6
2025-03-08vs Jo.Henry18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMarshall Lamb / Daniel Wascher vs Doug Myers / Parker Jones2-6, 0-6
2025-03-01vs Ra.Raj18ALost 02
L#2 SinglesDaniel Wascher vs Chris Pereira6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNathaniel Turck / Steve Abourisk vs Jamie Mishich / Rajiv Raj2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Bradford Stevens
published 3
2.76
Bryan Sutton
published 3
2.70
Marshall Lamb
published
2.64
Steve Abourisk
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Brent Berry
published 3
2.60
Nathaniel Turck
published
2.46
Daniel Wascher
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Abourisk + Marshall Lamb123 matchesnot enough data
Marshall Lamb + Daniel Wascher033 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Sutton + Bradford Stevens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bradford Stevens
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Bryan Sutton
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Marshall Lamb
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Steve Abourisk
21W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Brent Berry
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
Nathaniel Turck
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Daniel Wascher
17W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.