Teams

KY/BG/YOUNG

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over- BG · 4.0 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-01vs KY/BG/BARNWELLWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaxon Grover / Chad Young vs Evan Barnwell / Braden Coley8-2
2025-05-30vs KY/BG/BARNWELLWon 10
W#1 DoublesTimothy Kickert / Chad Young vs Jonathan Wood / Justin Hester9-7
2025-05-29vs KY/BG/BARNWELLWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad Young / Jon Newton vs Andy Staples / Evan Barnwell8-5
2025-05-28vs KY/BG/BARNWELLLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Young / Jon Newton vs Evan Barnwell / Andy Staples3-8
2025-05-26vs KY/BG/BARNWELLWon 20
W#1 DoublesMilton Crawford / Jon Newton vs James Almand / Dean Oleole8-2
W#2 DoublesChad Young / Timothy Kickert vs Jonathan Wood / Justin Hester8-3
2025-05-22vs KY/BG/BARNWELLWon 21
L#1 DoublesShahbaz Munawar / Ron Tipton vs Jonathan Wood / Charles Gillock2-8
W#2 DoublesTimothy Kickert / Charles Lin vs Jim Rodway / James Almand8-2
W#3 DoublesJon Newton / Bradley Jones vs Hank Campbell / Christopher Clarkson8-1
2025-05-19vs KY/BG/BARNWELLWon 21
L#1 DoublesRon Tipton / Shahbaz Munawar vs Charles Gillock / Jonathan Wood2-8
W#2 DoublesCharles Lin / Timothy Kickert vs Jim Rodway / James Almand8-3
W#3 DoublesBradley Jones / Jon Newton vs Christopher Clarkson / Hank Campbell8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bradley Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chad Young
published 4
3.72
Jaxon Grover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Shahbaz Munawar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Michael Lindsey
published
3.32
Ron Tipton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Charles Lin
published 3.5
Jon Newton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Milton Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Kickert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bradley Jones
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Chad Young
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaxon Grover
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Shahbaz Munawar
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Michael Lindsey
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Ron Tipton
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Charles Lin
2W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Newton
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Milton Crawford
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Kickert
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.