Teams

Vandenbrook Vintage Volleyers

2026 ADULT 55 & Over SUMMER DAYTIME · 7.0 WOMEN S26

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-09vs Moe Bowden Summer 55Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Hillmer / Janet Hansen vs Pam Bowden / Sarah Tuel4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Seifert / Kristen Rieser vs Melodie Marx / Monique Day1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKay Larson / Karen Bernthal vs Daisy Khalifa / Nancy Koch3-6, 3-6
2026-06-18vs Olig: WCC Clay-Z LadiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Sandberg / Lori Julian vs Shelly Gosz / Ann Nachbor3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Vandenbrook / Stephanie Reineck vs Kimberly Mueller / Jill Wine1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Hindt / Carrie Seifert vs Petra Koehn / Laurel Kroll6-2, 6-3
2026-06-11vs Hurd-ing CatsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Hindt / Julie Vandenbrook vs Marla Miller / Kristy Reardan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Hansen / Kristen Rieser vs Barb Brown / Marcia Harris1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLori Julian / Laura Bell vs Lynne Rasmussen / Kitty Yancey4-6, 3-6
2026-06-04vs Summer Sommers 2026Won 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Hansen / Maggie Hillmer vs Lisa Stingley / Kristi Kamish-Bushinski6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Julian / Kristen Rieser vs Cynthia Brady / Jeanne Elert6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlisa Bonta / Kay Larson vs Jill Riley / Laurie Meidt2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs Abrams: Oak Ridge Summer DaytimeLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Bell / Karen Bernthal vs Arlene Grodnick / Robin Ryan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Julian / Carrie Seifert vs Jill Sisk / Susan West Lundeen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Hindt / Kay Larson vs Elizabeth Micek / Pam Howard0-6, 3-6
2026-05-21vs Thies/SchneiderWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaggie Hillmer / Michelle Sandberg vs Catherine Carney / Susan Stombaugh6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlisa Bonta / Kristen Rieser vs Marlys Day / Michele Weddle6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs Dobbins: Net Six & ChillLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Reineck / Julie Vandenbrook vs Ellen Dobbins / Carrie Stolar6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Rieser / Janet Hansen vs Lori Henrich / Lisa Brecht7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlisa Bonta / Carrie Seifert vs Cory Borthwick / Amy Gustafson0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-07vs Bruder/ArnoldLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Hansen / Kristen Rieser vs Rachel Vogel / Karen Abel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Seifert / Alisa Bonta vs Michele Caulfield / Linda Hauser7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 WOMEN S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Moe Bowden Summer 557120412154
2Dobbins: Net Six & Chill62141026202
3Hurd-ing Cats5317718179
4Olig: WCC Clay-Z Ladies44101429227
5Summer Sommers 202644131130222
6Abrams: Oak Ridge Summer Daytime35101430232
7Bruder/Arnold3581635253
8Thies/Schneider2691534224
9Vandenbrook Vintage Volleyers2671736240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Julie Vandenbrook
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Janet Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Maggie Hillmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Lori Julian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Laura Bell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Michelle Sandberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Kay Larson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Denise Hindt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Karen Bernthal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Carrie Seifert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Alisa Bonta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kristen Rieser
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Stephanie Reineck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Larson + Denise Hindt7555% games−1.6% vs expected
Janet Hansen + Kristen Rieser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Vandenbrook
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.63
Janet Hansen
21W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Maggie Hillmer
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Lori Julian
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Laura Bell
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Michelle Sandberg
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
Kay Larson
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Denise Hindt
34W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Karen Bernthal
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Carrie Seifert
1W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Alisa Bonta
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.70
Kristen Rieser
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Reineck
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.