Teams

Single Minded

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-19vs SwingersLost 01
L#3 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Alison Serino1-6, 1-6
2024-09-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Sheila O'Connell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-27vs SwingersLost 03
L#1 SinglesSandra Murcia vs Cathy Robertson5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Sandy Thongphok6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJennie Kim vs Anto Faini1-6, 1-6
2024-08-19Lost 01
L#3 SinglesTamar Henkin vs Rui Liu2-6, 3-6
2024-08-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Krudys vs Loan Nguyen5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-01vs Juan 3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs ZIJING YE2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Krudys vs Xuan Du4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLuci del Aguila vs Barbara Braffett6-4, 7-5
2024-07-28vs New HomiesLost 12
L#1 SinglesSandra Murcia vs Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen2-6, 5-5
L#2 SinglesLuci del Aguila vs Yulan Jin2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-22vs Juan 3.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Xuan Du0-6, 2-6
2024-07-15vs SwingersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJennie Kim vs Anto Faini2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesSuzanne Krudys vs Diana Talesnick6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-13vs Juan 3.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJennie Kim vs ZIJING YE1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Sandra Murcia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Suzanne Krudys
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.23
Luci del Aguila
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Tamar Henkin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Nilam Patel
published
3.02
Anne Sherman
published 3.5
2.90
Robin Rudowitz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamar Henkin + Luci del Aguila123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandra Murcia
27W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Jennie Kim
265W–126L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Luci del Aguila
30W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Tamar Henkin
116W–147L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Nilam Patel
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Anne Sherman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Robin Rudowitz
25W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.