Teams

MTC Stephens' Resurgence

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Weekend Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-09vs Avalon GraingerLost 01
L#3 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Darren Golden vs Chris Giacchi / Steven Edlavitch4-6, 4-6
2024-06-02vs CCV Avery The WidowmakersWon 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Darren Golden vs Ty Wellford / Jim Mcvey7-5, 6-2
2024-05-02vs Three Chopt Young's Mean MachineWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarren Golden / Ryan Bardaro vs William Wise / Don Ha6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Weekend Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Charlie Wilson
published 4
3.87
Jacob Lenz
published 4
3.84
Jonathan McDorman
published
3.82
Charles Samson
published 4
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
Alex Balas
published 4
3.35
Ryan Bardaro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Darren Golden
published 3.5
3.33
David Aschheim
published 3.5
3.29
Andrew Lengua
published 3.5
3.25
Benjamin Andrews
published 3.5
3.17
Gregory Ewald
published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Marks
published
3.01
Brian Premock
published 3.5
Kevin Cousins
published
Olivier Houpert
published
Samuel Holley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Ewald + Brian Premock224 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Ewald + David Aschheim123 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Andrews + Andrew Lengua033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Wilson
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Jacob Lenz
30W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Jonathan McDorman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Charles Samson
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alex Balas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ryan Bardaro
177W–150L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Darren Golden
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
David Aschheim
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Lengua
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Benjamin Andrews
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gregory Ewald
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Brian Premock
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kevin Cousins
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Olivier Houpert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samuel Holley
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.