Teams

CVTA/Minerva Dano

2023 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '22 · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-31vs Robinson (RTCB)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Katt / Margie DeShon vs Sarah Blasius / Theresa Dulaney4-6, 4-6
2022-10-10vs Robinson (RTCB)Won 10
W#3 DoublesConilia Wade / Margie DeShon vs Terina Fowler / Sue Garland6-3, 7-5
2022-10-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesMargie DeShon vs Taylor Hill6-1, 6-1
2022-09-26vs Cargle (RTCB)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Beth Katt vs Pamela Peal / Phyllis Searles6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMargie DeShon vs Heather Chapman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Calli Davis
published 4
3.57
Kristin Bowie
published
3.35
Charlie Lewis
published 3.5
3.27
Dawn Wright
published 3.5
3.26
Renee Brown
published
3.23
Lisa Quinn
published
3.20
Megan McAbee
published
3.19
Chris Tarpley
published 3.5
3.17
Conilia Wade
published 3.5
3.13
Rebecca Camboia
published
3.09
Bonnie Burden
published 3.5
2.67
Tina Jones
published
Margie DeShon
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Minerva Dano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Brown + Megan McAbee6256% games−2.0% vs expected
Rebecca Camboia + Charlie Lewis3255% gamesnot enough data
Chris Tarpley + Lisa Quinn213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Quinn + Rebecca Camboia123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Camboia + Renee Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Calli Davis
46W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Kristin Bowie
17W–18L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Charlie Lewis
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Dawn Wright
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Renee Brown
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Lisa Quinn
23W–31L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Megan McAbee
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Chris Tarpley
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Conilia Wade
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Rebecca Camboia
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bonnie Burden
17W–31L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Tina Jones
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%12%88%
2.67
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Minerva Dano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.