Teams

Good Vibe Tribe

2026 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 Women Monday

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-07vs LobstersWon 41
W#1 DoublesChristie Golla / Marissa Murray vs Sallie Guy / Leanna Davis6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Schmidgall vs Ann Cross7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Lynch / Shannon Bohlen vs Meliza Alvarez / Valerie Ziegler6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNancy Aubin vs Ally Winslow2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeidi Haddock / Renata Goebel vs Julia Anderson / Betty Lansdale1-6, 3-6
2026-03-02vs Serve Me a DoubleWon 32
W#1 DoublesChristie Golla / Shannon Bohlen vs Elizabeth Fleming / Mary Cirilo7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNancy Aubin vs Patricia Phipps5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Reed / Holly Park vs Susan Townsend / Hanh Tran3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJami Painter vs Marina Henkes2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Lynch / Kristi Hayduk vs Karen Pozza / Yvette Schleiger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Sarah Schmidgall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Nancy Aubin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.40
Renata Goebel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Christie Golla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Amanda Reed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Holly Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Heidi Haddock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Stacy Berry
published
3.23
Judy Moeller
published
3.21
Teri Quance
published
3.21
Laura Ogrodnik
published
3.21
Teresa Mirarchi
published
3.21
Shannon Bohlen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Lisa Farris
published
3.18
Jami Painter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kristi Hayduk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Melissa Munson
published
Staci Neill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Moeller + Heidi Haddock7362% games+9.4% vs expected
Melissa Munson + Amanda Reed6455% games+8.8% vs expected
Nancy Aubin + Renata Goebel5456% games−0.4% vs expected
Teri Quance + Laura Ogrodnik224 matchesnot enough data
Christie Golla + Amanda Reed314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Reed + Shannon Bohlen404 matchesnot enough data
Holly Park + Amanda Reed213 matchesnot enough data
Renata Goebel + Shannon Bohlen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Schmidgall
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
Nancy Aubin
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Renata Goebel
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Christie Golla
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Amanda Reed
41W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Holly Park
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Heidi Haddock
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Stacy Berry
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Judy Moeller
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Teri Quance
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Laura Ogrodnik
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Teresa Mirarchi
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Shannon Bohlen
29W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
Lisa Farris
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Jami Painter
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Kristi Hayduk
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Melissa Munson
23W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Staci Neill
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.