Teams

UPTA65A/Michalovsky/Reserve

2025 UPTA Adult 65 & Over - SC · 65+ Men - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-11vs UPTA65A/Hanis/RiversideWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoland Fournier / Jessy Grasso vs Bob Hanis / David Dobson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGreg Lewis / Matthew McKinney vs Henere P Valk / Tim Walsh6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChuck DeCarbo / John Moss vs Mike Trask / Ed Steinbeck6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65+ Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Greg Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Roland Fournier
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Jessy Grasso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
John Moss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Chuck DeCarbo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Matthew McKinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Mikell Perry
published
3.25
Ryan Forbes
published
3.23
Hugh Hollister
published
3.08
Phil Barker
published
3.07
Marc Michalovsky
published
3.00
Lynn Stetson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessy Grasso + Roland Fournier4260% gamesnot enough data
Greg Lewis + Matthew McKinney404 matchesnot enough data
Hugh Hollister + Chuck DeCarbo314 matchesnot enough data
John Moss + Marc Michalovsky033 matchesnot enough data
Greg Lewis + Hugh Hollister213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Lewis
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Roland Fournier
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Jessy Grasso
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
John Moss
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Chuck DeCarbo
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Matthew McKinney
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Mikell Perry
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Ryan Forbes
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Hugh Hollister
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Phil Barker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Marc Michalovsky
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Lynn Stetson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.