Teams

Gainer

2026 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-26vs WagnerAndoWon 31
W#1 DoublesMargaret Hewitt / Erin Shuttleworth vs Marni Ferner / Mariska Truesdale6-4, 0-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer McCall vs Amanda Britt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanielle Scalfani / Anjanette Spencer vs Joelle Ando / Kristen Jupena2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLiz Moysey / Steph DuPre vs Libbie Schaffer / Sandra Cerra6-2, 6-3
2026-05-12vs Malone/Drennan (40) 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesKathleen Henig / Elizabeth Borges vs Nicole Janawsky / Carol Drennan5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Patricia Furbay1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeri Kosterman / Helen Gainer vs Alice Weiser / Aileen Sutton6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLiz Moysey / Steph DuPre vs Alison Arnold / Diana Lancaster3-6, 2-6
2026-04-16vs Cannon CFCCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer McCall / Meagan Koch vs Ashley Woolwine / Mabel Kitchin1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Linda Smits6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDanielle Scalfani / Anjanette Spencer vs Cassidy Beall / Anne Tilghman Reiss0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Crittenden / Elizabeth Borges vs Sarah Gwathmey / Margaret Holmes6-2, 6-1
2026-03-19vs Russell/McCain 3.0 Spring 2026Won 31
L#1 DoublesSteph DuPre / Danielle Scalfani vs Christine Feeney / Shannon Russell2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Amy Murphy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Tyson Lee / Helen Gainer vs Tracie West / Jennifer Pennington6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Borges / Michelle Crittenden vs Sehr Belle / Rachel Mclean6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Michelle Crittenden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Kathleen Henig
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.88
Kimberly Bassano
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Anne Tyson Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Helen Gainer
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.83
Tracy Stephanski
published
2.79
Steph DuPre
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Margaret Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Teri Kosterman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Erin Shuttleworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Liz Moysey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Jennifer McCall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Diane Byrd
published 2.5
2.48
Elizabeth Borges
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Anjanette Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Meagan Koch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Danielle Scalfani
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Stephanski + Liz Moysey2546% games+8.6% vs expected
Margaret Hewitt + Teri Kosterman2539% games−1.1% vs expected
Teri Kosterman + Helen Gainer404 matchesnot enough data
Anne Tyson Lee + Helen Gainer314 matchesnot enough data
Diane Byrd + Helen Gainer224 matchesnot enough data
Meagan Koch + Danielle Scalfani224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Stephanski + Jennifer McCall134 matchesnot enough data
Helen Gainer + Kimberly Bassano404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Crittenden
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Kathleen Henig
17W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kimberly Bassano
32W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Anne Tyson Lee
10W–11L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Helen Gainer
61W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Tracy Stephanski
21W–24L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Steph DuPre
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Margaret Hewitt
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Teri Kosterman
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Erin Shuttleworth
29W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Liz Moysey
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Jennifer McCall
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Diane Byrd
30W–21L career · no lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Elizabeth Borges
31W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
3
Anjanette Spencer
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
Meagan Koch
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
3
Danielle Scalfani
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.