Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-07vs CSU GOLDLost 02
L#1 SinglesHarim Gonzalez vs Zac Wyse5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColby Mueller / Taylor Nguyen vs Reeves Anderson / Jacob Krause6-7, 3-6
2023-08-31vs CSU BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTaylor Nguyen / Colby Mueller vs Andrew Hampson / Seth Krammer6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHarim Gonzalez vs Bruce Chung1-6, 2-6
2023-08-24vs CSU WHITELost 02
L#1 DoublesHarim Gonzalez / John McNally vs Colton Dealy / Shannon Doyle3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesColby Mueller / Brent McNair vs Gordon Beck / Michael Dirvonas5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-17vs FCCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesBrent McNair / Brent Herring vs Shawn Farnell / Ken Kawakami1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristian Muna vs Ryan Selby6-7, 1-6
2023-08-03vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Adam Baker vs Reeves Anderson / Jeff Keepman7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHarim Gonzalez vs Elliot Graham0-6, 1-6
2023-07-27vs CSU BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Taylor Nguyen vs Ryan Pace / ALEX DHUPAR6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristian Muna / Harim Gonzalez vs Michael Wagner / Matthew Penhale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LVTA ORANGE227512111
2CSU GREEN225716129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Colby Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Brent Herring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Harim Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.11
Christian Muna
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
John McNally
published
4.03
Taylor Nguyen
published
Brent McNair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harim Gonzalez + Colby Mueller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colby Mueller
62W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Brent Herring
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Harim Gonzalez
33W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Christian Muna
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
John McNally
16W–20L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.09
Taylor Nguyen
18W–28L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Brent McNair
8W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.