← Teams

CAC-Day

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.8 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Allison Fryman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.53
Crystal Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Lisa Clevenger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Barbara Seatter
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results13 ties
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesThomas Lockhart / Katherine Kralj vs George Sampson / Lisa Askew6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2019-09-27Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesFrank Olson / Katherine Kralj vs Donna Kennish / Patrick Maginnis6-3, 6-0
2019-04-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / BreAnn Granville vs Catherine Go / Allison Gregory6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Binns / Barbara Seatter vs Brooke Burnett / Kimberly Reilly2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllison Fryman vs Kelly Miller6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2019-03-23Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesAllison Fryman vs Lisa Gangelhoff6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElda Nelson / Barbara Seatter vs Claire Thayer / Dalika Crawford6-4, 7-5
2019-03-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLinda Binns / Crystal Bryant vs Leslie OBrien / Suzanne DeLea6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElda Nelson / Barbara Seatter vs Kori Montpas / Bonny Carlson6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAllison Fryman vs Raini Spitze3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-03-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesKari Martin / Crystal Bryant vs Heather Dudley / Sherri Sacconaghi6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAllison Fryman vs Kristi Vargas6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Elda Nelson vs Kristin Lyman / Kathleen Budnick6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLucia von Flotow / Katherine Kralj vs Sarah Bradley / Lisa West6-0, 6-4
2019-02-24Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Hillary Ostlund vs Julie Hester / Kristi Vargas4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Irene Feldun vs Desiree Whitehall / Sarah Bradley6-2, 6-2
2019-02-10Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Crystal Bryant vs Alyssa Morrison Corvino / Lynn Sosa6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Itsuko Day vs Angie Lee / Dongju Won6-4, 6-4
2019-01-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKari Martin / Lisa Clevenger vs Kaelin Teo / Tao Hua6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Crystal Bryant vs Amiee Moyers / Juan Li6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Elda Nelson vs Cathy Gatzke / Laura Rundle2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-01-18Lost 0–3
L#1 SinglesAllison Fryman vs Halle Jackson6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCrystal Bryant vs Jenny Pizot6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Binns / Lisa Clevenger vs Christy Grisham / Christy Strange6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2018-12-02Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Linda Binns vs Susan Judge / Donna Feuerherdt7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarje Ferek / Barbara Seatter vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Kathy Schaub6-3, 6-4
2018-12-02Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Linda Binns vs Kristin Eckelman / Lisa Schaller6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Sheryl Wecker vs Catherine Leedy / Janae Pyle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2018-10-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesElda Nelson / Barbara Seatter vs Cheryl Klein / Teesha Clark6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Allison Fryman
49W–24L career
3%97%1%
3.73
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Crystal Bryant
105W–117L career
24%76%0%
3.53
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%1%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Seatter
48W–60L career
1%97%2%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.