Teams

RChandler/JB/AP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-01-12vs McGee/JB/APWon 21
L#1 SinglesChase Myers vs Alex Camp2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJameson McFadden vs Mark Thompson6-1, 4-6
W#3 SinglesReginald Chandler vs Daniel Massirer6-3, 5-2
2024-12-12vs McGee/JB/APWon 21
W#1 SinglesJustin Patterson vs Patrick Patterson6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJameson McFadden vs Connor Patrom6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesChase Myers vs Alex Camp3-6, 1-6
2024-11-26vs McGee/JB/APLost 03
L#1 SinglesJustin Patterson vs Alex Camp5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAlex Markum vs Patrick Patterson6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesColton Kibler vs Mark Thompson1-6, 0-6
2024-10-27vs McGee/JB/APWon 21
L#1 SinglesChase Myers vs Alex Camp2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJameson McFadden vs Patrick Patterson6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesReginald Chandler vs Jeremy Taggart6-1, 6-3
2024-10-21vs McGee/JB/APLost 12
L#1 SinglesJameson McFadden vs Alex Camp5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesChase Myers vs Connor Patrom6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAlex Markum vs Patrick Patterson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Reginald Chandler
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Chase Myers
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Justin Patterson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.76
Jameson McFadden
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.72
Alex Markum
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Colton Kibler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chase Myers + Jameson McFadden2348% gamesnot enough data
Alex Markum + Colton Kibler224 matchesnot enough data
Justin Patterson + Reginald Chandler044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reginald Chandler
18W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Chase Myers
26W–34L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
Justin Patterson
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jameson McFadden
21W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Alex Markum
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Colton Kibler
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.