Teams

6 SCC McClenny Smash Potatoes

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-08vs 18 Southampton Roper 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesColleen Quattlebaum vs Virginia Loftin1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMorgan Vargo vs Caley Nunnally7-5, 6-3
2025-11-04vs 11 Westwood DiMeglioWon 21
W#1 SinglesSally Hurt vs Ryan Kirtner7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMorgan Vargo vs Amanda Boys6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKenica Eggan vs Nicole Weiland3-6, 1-6
2025-10-21vs 8 Belmont - NelsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Hurt vs Melissa Lloyd6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBailey Thornton vs Elizabeth Khatri3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-14vs 1 HCC MayerWon 21
W#1 SinglesColleen Quattlebaum vs Alex Mendez6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMorgan Vargo vs Samantha McLean2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKimberly Means vs Meghan Hale7-5, 6-4
2025-10-02vs 4 WW Tennis the Menace - RaymondWon 21
W#1 SinglesKimberly Means vs Lexie Allen6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKenica Eggan vs Emilie Raymond2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAimee Collins vs Barbara Bailey6-3, 4-5
2025-09-30vs 2 ACAC Slice Slice Baby - RiceLost 03
L#1 SinglesColleen Quattlebaum vs Kristen Hornbeck6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSally Hurt vs Kelli Bonner3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKenica Eggan vs Ashley Diersen7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-23vs 19 MAC Court Queens II - HarisovaLost 12
W#1 SinglesEmily McClenny vs CONSTANCE MATTOX6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKenica Eggan vs Kayci McLeod1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBailey Thornton vs Maria Gault5-7, 3-6
2025-09-16vs 16 WOCC Hamlin single ladiesLost 12
W#1 SinglesSally Hurt vs Kristin Hamlin6-3, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMorgan Vargo vs Katy Knierim4-6, 4-5
L#3 SinglesAimee Collins vs Francesca Purcell6-4, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Emily McClenny
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Colleen Quattlebaum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kimberly Means
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Sally Hurt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Aimee Collins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.54
Morgan Vargo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Kenica Eggan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Bailey Thornton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily McClenny
28W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Colleen Quattlebaum
28W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kimberly Means
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Sally Hurt
13W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Aimee Collins
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Vargo
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Kenica Eggan
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Bailey Thornton
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.