Teams

HCC Hansen

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-11Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Hansen / Michele Ironsmith vs Jennifer Myers / CARTER NETTINA1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Geshel / Jennifer Drukteinis vs Debra Stump / Maria-Claudia Herrera6-3, 6-3
2023-02-25vs HCC - A. GiangLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Aspen Kahl vs Daniella Arcila / Lorraine Chon-Qui3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Alize Uyttenhove Farhat vs Bobbi Witt / Elaine Aschenbrenner5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTania Biller / Stephanie Geshel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-11vs Hills /Means/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Rena Khawam vs Stephanie Means / Margaret Roset4-6, 2-6
2023-02-04vs RH Smokin Aces - S. PatrickWon 21
L#1 DoublesRena Khawam / Avery Zercoe vs Debra Stump / Maria-Claudia Herrera7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAbby Kronk / Michele Ironsmith vs Shannon Griffin / Marie Teixeira6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephanie Geshel / Stephanie Wager vs Amber Morgenstern / Lisa Nicoll7-6, 6-0
2023-02-01vs HCC - A. GiangWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Kayla Dyer vs Angie Jones / Jamie Hamilton6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMarcy Faircloth / Abby Kronk vs Andrea Fajardo / Irene Arias Gutierrez6-3, 6-3
2023-01-28vs Hills /Means/18&Over4.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Avery Zercoe vs Mollie Simpson / Judi Alford2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTania Biller / Jennifer Drukteinis vs Maki Smith / Dagmar O'Rourke4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Michele Ironsmith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.47
Avery Zercoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Stephanie Wager
published 4.5
4.22
Kayla Dyer
published
4.20
Alize Uyttenhove Farhat
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Abby Kronk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Jennifer Drukteinis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Aspen Kahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.74
Tania Biller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Stephanie Geshel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jillene Davis
published
Kimberly French
published
Lisa Freeman
published
Rena Khawam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Wager + Michele Ironsmith19561% games−0.4% vs expected
Avery Zercoe + Michele Ironsmith7068% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Drukteinis + Aspen Kahl314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Drukteinis + Stephanie Geshel123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Geshel + Michele Ironsmith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Avery Zercoe
67W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Stephanie Wager
55W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
4.39
Kayla Dyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Alize Uyttenhove Farhat
59W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Abby Kronk
69W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Aspen Kahl
111W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Tania Biller
75W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Stephanie Geshel
58W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly French
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rena Khawam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.