Teams

1-BBaird-CHTC

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-02vs 6-KRyan-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBonni Baird / Christina Deprez vs Jennifer Pyle / Elizabeth Yancy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGail Calloway / Araya Coffey vs Ruth Caccavale / Caroline Carrico1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Pratt / Nilzimar Hauskrecht vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-25vs 8-LGilchrist-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBonni Baird / Tracy Crowley vs Melissa Israel / Jennifer Woods6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Mayell / Araya Coffey vs Laura Porter / Linda Gilchrist6-2, 6-3
2024-08-28vs 9-MKuehn-DFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Pratt / Laurie Droke vs Meta Kuehn / Amy Johnston4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBonni Baird / Tracy Crowley vs Stephanie Thomas / Danette Pachtner7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAraya Coffey / Deb Reisinger vs Charlotte Clark / Sarah Parker7-5, 6-2
2024-08-21vs 2-BTareen-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Laurie Droke vs Alison Kalinowski / Laurie Keilholz4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBonni Baird / Michelle Polster vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-18vs 7-LBible-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Mary Carter Taub vs Anne Heymann / Kelly Conklin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBonni Baird / Tracy Crowley vs Jonda Young / Lindsay Mize6-4, 7-5
2024-08-14vs 3-DCorey-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Mary Carter Taub vs Jane Thrailkill / Breah Woolson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Pratt / Tracy Crowley vs Yvonne Acker / Beth Nielsen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Celina Morice
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Kelly Jarrett
published
3.26
Nilzimar Hauskrecht
published
3.10
Sharon Mayell
published
3.00
Brenda Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.97
Araya Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Bonni Baird
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.57
Christina Deprez
published 3
Michelle Polster
published
Monica Kolzet
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Celina Morice
92W–77L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Kelly Jarrett
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Nilzimar Hauskrecht
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Sharon Mayell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Brenda Pratt
97W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Bonni Baird
42W–50L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Christina Deprez
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Michelle Polster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Kolzet
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.