Teams

Selma - Tucker

2025 Selma Adult 40 & Over · Women's 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-03vs Selma - RobertsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Jones / Dana Bohannon vs Christy Mathiews / Alicia Beers2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesWhitney Holladay vs Eunyoung Kim4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMallory Kelley / Rayne Osborn vs Jennifer Roberts / Fran Spivey6-4, 6-4
2025-04-26vs Selma - RobertsLost 13
W#1 DoublesWhitney Holladay / Melinda Fuller vs Alicia Beers / Jennifer Roberts7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNikki Gilmore vs Eunyoung Kim6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Bohannon / Molly Williams vs Fran Spivey / Christy Mathiews3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesInge Bergeron / Tracy Jones vs Jennifer Rowell Jones / Kennedy Bergeron4-6, 2-6
2025-04-19vs Selma - RobertsLost 13
L#1 DoublesAbbie Tucker / Mallory Kelley vs Jennifer Dobbs / Catherine Thomas6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRayne Osborn vs Jennifer Rowell Jones7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNikki Gilmore / Dana Bohannon vs Miriam Scharf / Molly Killingsworth6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Fuller / Whitney Holladay vs Jennifer Roberts / Alicia Beers1-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs Selma - RobertsLost 04
L#1 DoublesNikki Gilmore / Dana Bohannon vs Miriam Scharf / Molly Killingsworth6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesRayne Osborn vs Fran Spivey4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMallory Kelley / Abbie Tucker vs Jennifer Dobbs / Catherine Thomas6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Fuller / Tracy Jones vs Jennifer Rowell Jones / Kennedy Bergeron3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Melinda Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Abbie Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dana Bohannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Inge Bergeron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Molly Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rayne Osborn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Whitney Holladay
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda Fuller
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Abbie Tucker
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dana Bohannon
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Inge Bergeron
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Kelley
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Williams
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Gilmore
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rayne Osborn
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Whitney Holladay
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.