Teams

River Strand Petersen

2023 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Friday

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-17vs LBK Public AitkenWon 10
W#3 DoublesColleen Kendle / Christie Stephenson vs Molly Gleason / Angelika Refay6-4, 6-1
2023-03-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesColleen Kendle / Christie Stephenson vs Susie Lentile / Wendy Weiss5-7, 3-6
2023-03-03vs LBK Club DruckerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Nicoletti / Christie Stephenson vs Christina DeCarlo / Sandy Schonhoff2-6, 2-6
2023-02-24vs LWR No Drama MamasWon 10
W#1 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom / Claudia Schwab6-2, 6-3
2023-02-17vs LWR No Drama MamasLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristie Stephenson / Colleen Kendle vs Kathy Rain / Andrea Deitch1-6, 4-6
2023-02-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Joyce Bastarache / Gail Russell6-2, 6-4
2023-01-20vs LBK Club DruckerLost 01
L#1 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Sandra Duryea / Linda Gillott5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Chris Poole
published 4
3.69
Penny Franklin
published
3.55
Hattie Grimsley
published 4
3.46
Sharyn Quiros
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Susan Nicoletti
published
3.29
Colleen Kendle
published 3.5
Barb Wenzel
published 3.5
3.07
Christie Stephenson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Leslie Adkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Stephenson + Sharyn Quiros1441% gamesnot enough data
Christie Stephenson + Susan Nicoletti213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Poole + Penny Franklin123 matchesnot enough data
Sylvia Sethares-Heyl + Susan Nicoletti213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Poole
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Penny Franklin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Hattie Grimsley
4W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Sharyn Quiros
96W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Susan Nicoletti
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Colleen Kendle
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Barb Wenzel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christie Stephenson
42W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Sylvia Sethares-Heyl
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
Leslie Adkins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.