Teams

LOS GATOS SR 40MX7.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

25 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kristin Dillehay
published
3.42
Emily Burns
published 3.5
3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.31
Charla Serbent
published 3.5
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.18
Elizabeth Stukan
published 3.5
3.11
Sandeep Nama
published
3.07
Vijay Rathee
published
3.05
Wendy Hibberd
published
2.99
Sheila Hutchinson
published
2.97
Joe Menkhaus
published 3
2.97
Lauren Kutting
published
2.82
Huck Hibberd
published 3
2.82
Michel Schreurs
published
2.78
Michelle Yoo
published
2.76
Haik Russell
published 3
Ashley Pass
published 3
2.74
Gary Serbent
published 3
2.73
Justin Cowling
published
2.73
Eugene Priadka
published 3
2.64
Darin Dillehay
published 3
2.63
Vicki Velez
published
2.52
Aviva Garrett
published 3
2.43
Viktor Sokolenko
published
Katie McBride
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Burns + Vijay Rathee123 matchesnot enough data
Pauline Teunissen + Michel Schreurs033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Dillehay
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
3.5
Emily Burns
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Pauline Teunissen
20W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Charla Serbent
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Mary Jo Lee
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Stukan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandeep Nama
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Vijay Rathee
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Wendy Hibberd
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Sheila Hutchinson
13W–29L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Joe Menkhaus
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lauren Kutting
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Huck Hibberd
16W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Michel Schreurs
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Michelle Yoo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Haik Russell
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ashley Pass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Gary Serbent
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Justin Cowling
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Eugene Priadka
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Darin Dillehay
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
Vicki Velez
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Aviva Garrett
6W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Viktor Sokolenko
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Katie McBride
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.