Teams

Smash and Dash

2026 WY Tri-Level · Cheyenne

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-30vs Team HOPELost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Moore / Vickki Schlappi vs Ginger Phillips / Justine Barone2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Dodi Campbell vs Rachel Robertson / Michelle Bush3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGinger Paige / Patricia Hansen vs Priscilla Gill / Vicky Kmetz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-20vs Team HOPEWon 20
W#2 DoublesSharon Buccino / Dodi Campbell vs Rachel Robertson / Sheri Foster6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ginger Paige vs Katherine Plowman / Brittany Wardle4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-15vs Team HOPELost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Moore / Vickki Schlappi vs Ginger Phillips / Justine Barone3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Buccino / Cheryl Johnson vs Michelle Bush / Rachel Robertson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ginger Paige vs Katherine Plowman / Brittany Wardle3-6, 4-6
2026-07-06vs Team HOPELost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Moore / Vickki Schlappi vs Ginger Phillips / Justine Barone2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Buccino / Cheryl Johnson vs Rachel Robertson / Sheri Foster2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Hansen / Rene Williams vs Priscilla Gill / Vicky Kmetz6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cheyenne have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Moore
published 4.5
4.02
Vickki Schlappi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.72
Dodi Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Patricia Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Hayes
published
Rene Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Buccino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Hansen + Rene Williams3540% games−3.6% vs expected
Patricia Hansen + Ginger Paige81142% games−10.1% vs expected
Dodi Campbell + Rene Williams044 matchesnot enough data
Rene Williams + Ginger Paige123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Moore
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Vickki Schlappi
67W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Dodi Campbell
39W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
3.5
Ginger Paige
27W–57L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Patricia Hansen
26W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Megan Hayes
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rene Williams
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Buccino
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.