Teams

Lady Acers

2022 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-29vs Serving YouWon 20
W#2 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Denise Martin Barnes vs Ann-Lee Chen / Karolyn Clarke6-4, 5-2
W#3 DoublesLenora Spencer / Alina Luca vs Donna Garland / Jade Moore6-4, 6-3
2022-07-19vs Double the FunLost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Sellassie / Rachele Stines vs Ruxandra Badiu / Karen Francis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Lenora Spencer vs Sandra Peterson / Natasha Rones1-6, 2-6
2022-07-13vs Net GirlzLost 12
L#1 SinglesRachele Stines vs MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG6-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesCynthia Rapp / Shirin Ahmed vs Telores Hill / Nicole Ifill2-6, 1-2
W#3 DoublesLenora Spencer / Elsie Stines vs Constance Manning / Denise Milligan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-10vs Net GirlzLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacinda Johnson / Lenora Spencer vs Tracy Walls / Mia Dozier4-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRachele Stines vs Nicole Ifill1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEbla Aliibrahim / Alina Luca vs Tinya Coles-Cieply / Constance Manning6-1, 6-2
2022-07-06vs Double the FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Rapp / Shirin Ahmed vs Karen Francis / Bernadette Walker6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRachele Stines vs Chanpen Teeranon2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jacinda Johnson
published 3.5
3.42
Cynthia Rapp
published 3.5
3.22
3.18
Ebla Aliibrahim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Shirin Ahmed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
2.95
Rachele Stines
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Karen Casey
published
2.79
Lenora Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Elsie Stines
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachele Stines + Lenora Spencer14951% games−4.9% vs expected
Shirin Ahmed + Lenora Spencer5258% gamesnot enough data
Ebla Aliibrahim + Shirin Ahmed3345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacinda Johnson
37W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Cynthia Rapp
36W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Denise Martin Barnes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Ebla Aliibrahim
60W–136L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Shirin Ahmed
198W–134L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Rachele Stines
165W–138L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Lenora Spencer
300W–174L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Elsie Stines
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.