Teams

CSRC GUNTER

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-01vs LTFCS VANDEVEERLost 01
L#2 DoublesNate Hopkins / Kenneth Ryals vs Ashton Zito / Matthew Pape6-7, 2-6
2021-05-18vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 10
W#2 DoublesKenneth Ryals / Nate Hopkins vs Mark Dale / John Tompkins6-4, 7-6
2021-05-04vs MEMPK ABELLOLost 01
L#2 DoublesNate Hopkins / Kenneth Ryals vs Phil Abello / Chris Straub6-7, 4-6
2021-04-27vs LTFCS VANDEVEERLost 01
L#3 DoublesKenneth Ryals / Nate Hopkins vs Greg Keirns / Neal Siegel5-7, 3-6
2021-04-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHoward Lau / Nate Hopkins vs Ryan Frost / ERIC FACY0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Nate Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Brian Renga
published 3.5
3.09
Paul Hurcomb
published
3.06
Philip Erickson
published
3.05
Brad Stark
published 3.5
3.02
Michael Reynolds
published
2.96
Kevin Wells
published
2.96
Doug Colvard
published 3
2.81
Mickey Gunter
published
Howard Lau
published
Kenneth Ryals
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Hopkins + Kenneth Ryals2645% games−9.9% vs expected
Kevin Wells + Mickey Gunter1440% gamesnot enough data
Doug Colvard + Philip Erickson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nate Hopkins
66W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Brian Renga
0W–4L career · type T · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Hurcomb
15W–22L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.09
Philip Erickson
12W–22L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Brad Stark
9W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Michael Reynolds
75W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kevin Wells
6W–21L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Doug Colvard
21W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
2.96
Mickey Gunter
6W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
Howard Lau
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kenneth Ryals
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.