Teams

Sing, Stephanie

2026 Adult 55 & Over-JXN · Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-29vs MS 4.0W 55 & Over (Baine)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLeisa McCool / Stephanie Sing vs Susan Jackson / Mary Taylor6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Sawardecker / September Moore vs Emily Barnes / Cindi Beesley5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen Campbell / Robin Harkey vs Jordan Goodwin / Becky Pardue1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Gibson, AnneLost 03
L#1 DoublesSeptember Moore / Mary Sawardecker vs Libby Jones / Cathy Ainsworth6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Cantrell / Jennifer Evans vs Lela Carter / Suzanne Colbert6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen Campbell / Robin Harkey vs Lila Gibbs / Deborah Norman3-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs MS 4.0W 55 & Over (Baine)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNikki Elam / Leisa McCool vs Lauree Davis / Melissa K Beach3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Sawardecker / Didi Williams vs Pshan Baine / Emily Barnes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Cantrell / Jennifer Evans vs Kim Tatum / Cindi Beesley2-6, 4-6
2026-02-22vs Gibson, AnneWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Elam / Leisa McCool vs Cathy Ainsworth / Lynn Ogden6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColleen Campbell / Robin Harkey vs Lela Carter / Suzanne Colbert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary D Randall / September Moore vs Deborah Norman / Lila Gibbs3-6, 2-6
2026-02-08vs MS 4.0W 55 & Over (Baine)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSeptember Moore / Mary Sawardecker vs Angie DeLeon / Michele Rumbley3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDidi Williams / Mary Beth Cantrell vs Lauree Davis / Melissa K Beach0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Evans / Leisa McCool vs Susan Jackson / Jordan Goodwin6-3, 6-4
2026-02-07vs Gibson, AnneLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Cantrell / Didi Williams vs Anne Gibson / Kathy Rhodes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSeptember Moore / Jennifer Evans vs Lila Gibbs / Deborah Norman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Sawardecker / Colleen Campbell vs Lela Carter / Suzanne Colbert4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Mary Sawardecker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.47
Nikki Elam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Robin Harkey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Colleen Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
September Moore
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Leisa McCool
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Didi Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.23
Mary Beth Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Stephanie Sing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary D Randall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Elam + Leisa McCool4256% games+16.6% vs expected
Mary Sawardecker + Colleen Campbell3347% gamesnot enough data
Robin Harkey + Colleen Campbell123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Sawardecker + September Moore033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Sawardecker
5W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Nikki Elam
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
Robin Harkey
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
4
Colleen Campbell
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
September Moore
12W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Leisa McCool
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.35
4
Didi Williams
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34
Mary Beth Cantrell
31W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Stephanie Sing
38W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Mary D Randall
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.