Teams

Bryant, Debbie

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-19vs King, ChaseLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Bryant / Elizabeth Ducote vs Beverly Mann / LI Zhou0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGenifer Freeman / Joy Cloud vs Allison Ruhl / Jill Webb0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRose Edmonston / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Frances Spinosa / Lavonne Sims1-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs Woodruff, ElissaLost 03
L#1 DoublesGenifer Freeman / Kathryn Johnson vs Shelley White / Tara Baugh2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Bryant / Teri Norton vs Cecil Patton / Amanda Carter2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeenie Norris / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Stephanie Sing / Melissa Galbraith0-6, 0-6
2026-08-05vs Sims, GinnyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bradshaw / Lisa Wheat vs Ginny Sims / Jamie Walker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeri Norton / Rhonda Hamilton vs Joanna Sykes / Polly Moon5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoy Cloud / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Anita Trigg / Kimberly Wooten0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1King, Chase2060030
2Woodruff, Elissa2051328
3Sims, Ginny2042757
4Santangelo, Faye1133645
5Crowder, Jeanna02151165
6Bryant, Debbie02151167
7Morales, Brittany02151168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Debbie Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Teri Norton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Rhonda Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Deenie Norris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Jennifer Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Cecilia Sawicki
published 3
2.38
Joy Cloud
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Rose Edmonston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.25
Elizabeth Ducote
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Feathers
published
Genifer Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Hamilton + Joy Cloud2541% games+4.6% vs expected
Teri Norton + Debbie Bryant0523% games−21.5% vs expected
Teri Norton + Rhonda Hamilton0646% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debbie Bryant
18W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
Teri Norton
2W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Rhonda Hamilton
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Deenie Norris
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jennifer Bradshaw
34W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57
3
Cecilia Sawicki
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Joy Cloud
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Rose Edmonston
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Elizabeth Ducote
3W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Emily Feathers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Genifer Freeman
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.