Teams

Barkley/Bentonville/MRC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-27vs Divakaruni/Bentonville/KTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLance Court / Max Garcia vs Shashikanth Divakaruni / SIVA SANKAR BACHANABOYANA7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRobert Sidani vs Sindhoor Velaga1-6, 2-6
2025-05-10vs Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Barkley / Lance Court vs Robert Jones / Anthony Jones2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Bauer / Ryan Bell vs Jeff Schutz / Jamie Cornett4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMax Garcia / Robert Sidani vs Will Ginger / Daniel Short4-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs Garrett/Fayetteville/SRCWon 31
W#1 DoublesCooper Barkley / Joshua Ammons vs Voja Radosavljevic / Tihomir Buncic6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLance Court / Pablo Corona vs John Gottbrath / Jeff Gabbard6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAJ Smith vs Trenton Miller6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJose Gonzalez / Bruce Barkley vs SANDEEP KANAMALA / Mitchell Johnson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Cooper Barkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
AJ Smith
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Bobby Willis
published 4
Derrick Johnson
published 4
3.73
Pablo Corona
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Bruce Barkley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Lance Court
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Ryan Bell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Joshua Ammons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Max Garcia
published
Robert Sidani
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Barkley + Cooper Barkley5152% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Barkley + Pablo Corona404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cooper Barkley
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
AJ Smith
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Bobby Willis
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Derrick Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pablo Corona
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Bruce Barkley
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Lance Court
36W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Ryan Bell
21W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Joshua Ammons
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Max Garcia
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Sidani
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.